Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp953991ybl; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:05:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwqhv/3RP/gcqcJf+xPG8p1brY0HrQ1iclnn7tUSxY9td6XU2HKKjpBGy0KASxdy/XynFRh X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6c8b:: with SMTP id c11mr3482208otr.280.1576087516320; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:05:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1576087516; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xsrRCyEvqmws8BdrnCl46VrLuKZYYGkicY49kd5IKcYG6LpYFyhhpvOpjR3Xf+qTl4 WPfMDhnr/2Zr4pmm1cCQNZdOvFbtm2jluyyevuQeRP5kHSl19maazON7YpG1WYTTdb+/ WLhI9crE4Wf9xfzPnho8ibkvRueox6l2I68GrfFQ6vdQh8b+AYLWEJRm7WRoyVDi1sMe YlZSBa3qxCFmLvXoks8AV28B4tXvR7aT6oxFU9YJs33cw60PXSz9jP5oJRKnzNYMdSD8 6KvYTF5RNMcsjX92mMk9S/D4KS9q4wHpQmQK+3hFl6dde/OWq7EmT3f2KmIcWHG1YbR/ gJ5A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=Fi4Q87KPOGUf3IORYIPDWKCDzBYRRai3rmOJENP38o0=; b=X5htFNLRwp60c9+/1/Er9DJLzBvxxdSUJOAE/kyDblT0d/8VXa/IxoWASg+VT0KvA3 qRRMgfHWWLHTU99eJOodHv+9ulTMFGJKcf3YMOevXT0+V58dV+tf4cFoD9dMhNrgEpFR 5KJYKasWOoNppqpLBXh/MjGgWZgTPJ3GQ1/iDU+LC7+HyEzPHaoBQajAOtA/+4QHkAH9 S0IfC7jJZRzbXY6tNDPxnKtN6TNZ8e51i96o3HFEGEUE/E+xcjZmlDw+WwRgjnNyAcru nN8bdQUu1vvIGQ6ONf+ArZPPkcUqlqAif6NtkRIY7h2zJgnCvpKdFhL7gnun4VY2GqcQ 8BXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w65si1609008oig.149.2019.12.11.10.05.03; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:05:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730831AbfLKSDN (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 13:03:13 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:17321 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730334AbfLKSDN (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 13:03:13 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Dec 2019 10:03:12 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,302,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="245373947" Received: from rchatre-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.24.14.138]) ([10.24.14.138]) by fmsmga002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Dec 2019 10:03:04 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/resctrl: fix an imbalance in domain_remove_cpu To: Qian Cai , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, sboyd@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20191211033042.2188-1-cai@lca.pw> From: Reinette Chatre Message-ID: <9e7483f2-75cc-afaa-e1ea-287a970d4579@intel.com> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:02:56 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191211033042.2188-1-cai@lca.pw> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Qian, On 12/10/2019 7:30 PM, Qian Cai wrote: > A system that supports resource monitoring may have multiple resources > while not all of these resources are capable of monitoring. Monitoring > related state is initialized only for resources that are capable of > monitoring and correspondingly this state should subsequently only be > removed from these resources that are capable of monitoring. > > domain_add_cpu() calls domain_setup_mon_state() only when r->mon_capable > is true where it will initialize d->mbm_over. However, > domain_remove_cpu() calls cancel_delayed_work(&d->mbm_over) without > checking r->mon_capable resulting in an attempt to cancel d->mbm_over on > all resources, even those that never initialized d->mbm_over because > they are not capable of monitoring. Hence, it triggers a debugobjects > warning when offlining CPUs because those timer debugobjects are never > initialized. > > ODEBUG: assert_init not available (active state 0) object type: > timer_list hint: 0x0 > WARNING: CPU: 143 PID: 789 at lib/debugobjects.c:484 > debug_print_object+0xfe/0x140 > Hardware name: HP Synergy 680 Gen9/Synergy 680 Gen9 Compute Module, BIOS > I40 05/23/2018 > RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0xfe/0x140 > Call Trace: > debug_object_assert_init+0x1f5/0x240 > del_timer+0x6f/0xf0 > try_to_grab_pending+0x42/0x3c0 > cancel_delayed_work+0x7d/0x150 > resctrl_offline_cpu+0x3c0/0x520 > cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 > cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 > smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 > kthread+0x1e6/0x210 > ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 > > Fixes: e33026831bdb ("x86/intel_rdt/mbm: Handle counter overflow") > Signed-off-by: Qian Cai > --- Thank you very much. Acked-by: Reinette Chatre Reinette