Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1088186ybl; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:18:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw6TKd31oPZK6uFslzqg/l3jRk7o0+lwr6/kyEzX4y8vcyxz/eU10rreehNXUckB0xp5y2j X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4c08:: with SMTP id l8mr3740314otf.360.1576095486477; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:18:06 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1576095486; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=02qJtkkSYa7zcLNL9hu26NevvdOhf8Jt6ucpzgrSIfueDjJZ60HHMXSNNPtjD/xa2V aP4DM2GkGY1XikLpoAytfZK2pVpVRRT8W89RuD/BHba88JRbnyAivG6LmP9G18aUSNVT 0D4vB+NkFUlDH2nJWdPrvMtPajuUq0Rq2Pf+I7RIirnEFDPRakDOwgyGVcivT3DHo8ra e+non67IQEkzkcqHJMmZ7Mlxx00aNSSrYVxFwkf2YG9rVUTLuEH9ZkVdzSUChEeIgaz2 yIVe4z3gwi27gtaua1CPiGPwiLo1ftdIQg1+dt1tQtARxR7rsLdS02qBiZeonN3dolcy hX4w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=NMKTiqmaqgp1b9ZcInbg6dpfW8rIRMVjJGujYquFpL8=; b=A+Q7ih5Qb8PfTR9e8xTSIPE3c6/i0PxhNhxzoZyqzBhJCkqPgUJtJqQlXm7445qYiQ a4JvDW2XHhgEGmixclDtmNojoWPMULACHa2OEeKJc7/fgKYUA7PhvdOREP9BalN6W9Bo ehSTr2xtJTtVfPm9TOV8Mjy3kf0r9ueo05JOqo+kt7/O717568iRWH3wAY/U+UIOq35o PK4L7+vionYw+6+M6CJixcVNR/pnOvbWoaKKGIQV0+/A0pTlSUSuLADmGkDHyTS6eAch rHoiEImIpikCcg9OK6geN7ZVuHcNFcyPb6UDSAG4LgbIqSsc951p0I/DvH/hJMopMUdi bg/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z1si1917912otq.21.2019.12.11.12.17.54; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:18:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727466AbfLKURS (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:17:18 -0500 Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:51335 "EHLO relay12.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726411AbfLKURR (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:17:17 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [195.39.63.77]) (Authenticated sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C366C200008; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 20:17:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 21:17:09 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Andreas Kemnade Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, a.zummo@towertech.it, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, stefan@agner.ch, b.galvani@gmail.com, phh@phh.me, letux-kernel@openphoenux.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] rtc: rtc-rc5t619: add ricoh rc5t619 RTC driver Message-ID: <20191211201709.GD1463890@piout.net> References: <20191129212045.18325-1-andreas@kemnade.info> <20191129212045.18325-7-andreas@kemnade.info> <20191202093935.GA909634@piout.net> <20191211203321.3635b0c4@kemnade.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191211203321.3635b0c4@kemnade.info> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/12/2019 20:33:21+0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 10:39:35 +0100 > Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > On 29/11/2019 22:20:45+0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > > Add an RTC driver for the RTC device on Ricoh MFD rc5t619, > > > which is implemented as a variant of rn5t618. > > > > will capitalize chip names in the commit text as requested for the other > patches by Lee. > > > > rtc-range output: > > > Testing 2000-02-28 23:59:59. > > > OK > > > > > > Testing 2038-01-19 03:14:07. > > > OK > > > > > > Testing 2069-12-31 23:59:59. > > > OK > > > > > > Testing 2099-12-31 23:59:59. > > > KO RTC_RD_TIME returned 22 (line 138) > > > > > > Testing 2100-02-28 23:59:59. > > > KO RTC_SET_TIME returned 34 (line 122) > > > > > > Testing 2106-02-07 06:28:15. > > > KO RTC_SET_TIME returned 34 (line 122) > > > > > > Testing 2262-04-11 23:47:16. > > > KO RTC_SET_TIME returned 34 (line 122) > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni > > > I will remove > static int rc5t619_rtc_alarm_is_enabled(struct device *dev, uint8_t *enabled) > > since it is unused now so gcc emits a warning, which I have overlooked. > I hope your Acked-by still counts for that. > Sure, you can keep it. While at it, the subject should be: rtc: rc5t619: add ricoh rc5t619 RTC driver If you want, you can capitalize the second rc5t619 but not the first one. -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com