Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp93528ybl; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:36:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzk/UiwnpDZXFCud47C59ZS2bZWP90ysGKSQT2VKDUCchIOzWQz3Ijvp0xqjN8OfqCzR9cB X-Received: by 2002:aca:4fcd:: with SMTP id d196mr4616127oib.89.1576103793466; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:36:33 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1576103793; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZtN3KsagLXH8aEabqB606VcLyct1rMwBA99vl64d7EJoOR0wtke1jBeoqUUXSdTDSH HOTODU834WBtOsSMVrjmVG2rO0QvNRDp1+fIjUmzdwO1gea40GMztRnPGEtSJeUthqNG PcpbjU+zFM1Joqef6BLxtj7tzAbj98IslOgRW3aqVrvtlGGDQOAReFwN6QzlaBDa/PyF C8Jpuj1zNfaSCdW4YjaO+YZRmjeG4FpIP2y7ziIFAFzr83GVjabCD5A4yx8A8tx+PIpq paF7fzOR7dQYh+gM+ulathuL2xjfKn+GvBv7pSNvnZhoE7LbDalU0vM2iTNIbZZo+BTr cG+w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:from:subject:references :mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=rC4tOR/kyk4ZUKAZPKvyfm3r2gY5Mo2Zi+lINXPmnEk=; b=inG7GX+OUnHsr4zW2rz2kyNFrsGus8kItsnopJJsHw51vMzkkvvvT1m2XDbXQhI+oQ dDcdWzimsBAZVF4Qm8JZjy6ykgknm4v25Z6LyFn6klvSt62yzjtJ+iF9ou4ejn/WzSED oCOIQSYeNAzg3SDe1SdHSrpuoaayHXjBk5W4Ythuk9qa5m4QonNn8lHXnp8v2j1p/Lo7 RxJPrcq9XMo2vPegqLXG9idQ2mQxbHkV1jRo0ZSwDnz7sY7LYVoUIOhqiP9OXAl/NQuc egy5Icm/U9zUMIRzxxeopBde+L3LNJfj1PlK1W7i9MhcH8zMZY7PH3vFm/+VO+WiezZx d++g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QH6Y79uz; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w64si2050926oib.185.2019.12.11.14.36.20; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:36:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QH6Y79uz; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726975AbfLKWe0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 17:34:26 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f202.google.com ([209.85.215.202]:49836 "EHLO mail-pg1-f202.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726911AbfLKWeX (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 17:34:23 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f202.google.com with SMTP id u14so188610pgq.16 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:34:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=rC4tOR/kyk4ZUKAZPKvyfm3r2gY5Mo2Zi+lINXPmnEk=; b=QH6Y79uzDJFjMEBU4pIPFpxWInfJ6MmN1WVAWvmffKlNMbRS+eOKJaxlgG+iG2kwYj 7FsOE7nMHjnA2gbsIcPvnc39QlufrmU4X0jyLD+zCmruy/ItG0BuDLLet28j+K0pgIOn BtR0u+KHflzio54Kp//TN6EasCNzzX8SNpEJeJ8YVMC/irF4zY5TapiahabeCXsYyaOh SvdCvuPkhkLsb3rXlImJz/tDXUXuRR33EzdD81Vhv8XvPWKy3ShxseVxnrFDdFcqwgfJ YadJjFJurnsYcwgwct+9fxtPvnTcfx9m3vNvAZe3gtgoz4JtT1+WRdi9jtEwp0saDjeU 64kg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=rC4tOR/kyk4ZUKAZPKvyfm3r2gY5Mo2Zi+lINXPmnEk=; b=RWBgEI/k+Y5KGVmZygY7h6eC17DT9hxdh0bIR3E+RMLv3I0HbbUTHKtzsDUhmG4yJX YJMWAW9VQFV0Ygi3bPxX4FFY3u+3PPWXj02XFYSWC0fQrMrr9360ozpUQJNyjkalcchM as0yMKf+sybmXBEX3XL5GJIQ1dHD88LVhCwkceIWG+fYC7k3A4xXsUHsN3QGYIZl2x2r sj0ZxuCKR0PVNi1hnc3y2YuKVyLGFOaT4aA/SaNsmC2XKg+ymRmnDTh4He+lBiIt87rR 0oy7hsChvWrz1JUB/q/kUZ1yNBDqcxhg5iHys4R2q356SfEPRlriVkPa6uNXcVFe/oIv OLkg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/r4fn3U4DP3tdbk+aGrHr3z5dW22xpwwCQ1I89werPolFAiiv UTmOwfF5Ta9QSHwHGfw4ejQ7L/WTtjuM X-Received: by 2002:a63:5b0e:: with SMTP id p14mr7046671pgb.315.1576103662226; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:34:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:33:35 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20191211223344.165549-1-brianvv@google.com> Message-Id: <20191211223344.165549-3-brianvv@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20191211223344.165549-1-brianvv@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1.735.g03f4e72817-goog Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/11] bpf: add generic support for lookup and lookup_and_delete batch ops From: Brian Vazquez To: Brian Vazquez , Brian Vazquez , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , "David S . Miller" Cc: Yonghong Song , Stanislav Fomichev , Petar Penkov , Willem de Bruijn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This commit introduces generic support for the bpf_map_lookup_batch and bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_batch ops. This implementation can be used by almost all the bpf maps since its core implementation is relying on the existing map_get_next_key, map_lookup_elem and map_delete_elem functions. The bpf syscall subcommands introduced are: BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_BATCH The UAPI attribute is: struct { /* struct used by BPF_MAP_*_BATCH commands */ __aligned_u64 in_batch; /* start batch, * NULL to start from beginning */ __aligned_u64 out_batch; /* output: next start batch */ __aligned_u64 keys; __aligned_u64 values; __u32 count; /* input/output: * input: # of key/value * elements * output: # of filled elements */ __u32 map_fd; __u64 elem_flags; __u64 flags; } batch; in_batch/out_batch are opaque values use to communicate between user/kernel space, in_batch/out_batch must be of key_size length. To start iterating from the beginning in_batch must be null, count is the # of key/value elements to retrieve. Note that the 'keys' buffer must be a buffer of key_size * count size and the 'values' buffer must be value_size * count, where value_size must be aligned to 8 bytes by userspace if it's dealing with percpu maps. 'count' will contain the number of keys/values successfully retrieved. Note that 'count' is an input/output variable and it can contain a lower value after a call. If there's no more entries to retrieve, ENOENT will be returned. If error is ENOENT, count might be > 0 in case it copied some values but there were no more entries to retrieve. Note that if the return code is an error and not -EFAULT, count indicates the number of elements successfully processed. Suggested-by: Stanislav Fomichev Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song --- include/linux/bpf.h | 11 +++ include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 19 +++++ kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 172 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 202 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 35903f148be59..a16f209255a59 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -43,6 +43,11 @@ struct bpf_map_ops { int (*map_get_next_key)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *next_key); void (*map_release_uref)(struct bpf_map *map); void *(*map_lookup_elem_sys_only)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key); + int (*map_lookup_batch)(struct bpf_map *map, const union bpf_attr *attr, + union bpf_attr __user *uattr); + int (*map_lookup_and_delete_batch)(struct bpf_map *map, + const union bpf_attr *attr, + union bpf_attr __user *uattr); /* funcs callable from userspace and from eBPF programs */ void *(*map_lookup_elem)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key); @@ -838,6 +843,12 @@ void *bpf_map_area_alloc(u64 size, int numa_node); void *bpf_map_area_mmapable_alloc(u64 size, int numa_node); void bpf_map_area_free(void *base); void bpf_map_init_from_attr(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr); +int generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map, + const union bpf_attr *attr, + union bpf_attr __user *uattr); +int generic_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map, + const union bpf_attr *attr, + union bpf_attr __user *uattr); extern int sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled; diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index dbbcf0b02970b..36d3b885ddedd 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ enum bpf_cmd { BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM, BPF_MAP_FREEZE, BPF_BTF_GET_NEXT_ID, + BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH, + BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_BATCH, }; enum bpf_map_type { @@ -403,6 +405,23 @@ union bpf_attr { __u64 flags; }; + struct { /* struct used by BPF_MAP_*_BATCH commands */ + __aligned_u64 in_batch; /* start batch, + * NULL to start from beginning + */ + __aligned_u64 out_batch; /* output: next start batch */ + __aligned_u64 keys; + __aligned_u64 values; + __u32 count; /* input/output: + * input: # of key/value + * elements + * output: # of filled elements + */ + __u32 map_fd; + __u64 elem_flags; + __u64 flags; + } batch; + struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_PROG_LOAD command */ __u32 prog_type; /* one of enum bpf_prog_type */ __u32 insn_cnt; diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 2530266fa6477..708aa89fe2308 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -1206,6 +1206,120 @@ static int map_get_next_key(union bpf_attr *attr) return err; } +#define MAP_LOOKUP_RETRIES 3 + +static int __generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map, + const union bpf_attr *attr, + union bpf_attr __user *uattr, + bool do_delete) +{ + void __user *ubatch = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.in_batch); + void __user *uobatch = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.out_batch); + void __user *values = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.values); + void __user *keys = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.keys); + void *buf, *prev_key, *key, *value; + u32 value_size, cp, max_count; + bool first_key = false; + int err, retry = MAP_LOOKUP_RETRIES; + + if (attr->batch.elem_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK) + return -EINVAL; + + if ((attr->batch.elem_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) && + !map_value_has_spin_lock(map)) + return -EINVAL; + + value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map); + + max_count = attr->batch.count; + if (!max_count) + return 0; + + buf = kmalloc(map->key_size + value_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN); + if (!buf) + return -ENOMEM; + + err = -EFAULT; + first_key = false; + if (ubatch && copy_from_user(buf, ubatch, map->key_size)) + goto free_buf; + key = buf; + value = key + map->key_size; + if (!ubatch) { + prev_key = NULL; + first_key = true; + } + + for (cp = 0; cp < max_count;) { + if (cp || first_key) { + rcu_read_lock(); + err = map->ops->map_get_next_key(map, prev_key, key); + rcu_read_unlock(); + if (err) + break; + } + err = bpf_map_copy_value(map, key, value, + attr->batch.elem_flags, do_delete); + + if (err == -ENOENT) { + if (retry) { + retry--; + continue; + } + err = -EINTR; + break; + } + + if (err) + goto free_buf; + + if (copy_to_user(keys + cp * map->key_size, key, + map->key_size)) { + err = -EFAULT; + goto free_buf; + } + if (copy_to_user(values + cp * value_size, value, value_size)) { + err = -EFAULT; + goto free_buf; + } + + prev_key = key; + retry = MAP_LOOKUP_RETRIES; + cp++; + } + + if (!err) { + rcu_read_lock(); + err = map->ops->map_get_next_key(map, prev_key, key); + rcu_read_unlock(); + } + + if (err) + memset(key, 0, map->key_size); + + if ((copy_to_user(&uattr->batch.count, &cp, sizeof(cp)) || + (copy_to_user(uobatch, key, map->key_size)))) + err = -EFAULT; + +free_buf: + kfree(buf); + return err; +} + +int generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map, + const union bpf_attr *attr, + union bpf_attr __user *uattr) +{ + return __generic_map_lookup_batch(map, attr, uattr, false); +} + +int generic_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map, + const union bpf_attr *attr, + union bpf_attr __user *uattr) +{ + return __generic_map_lookup_batch(map, attr, uattr, true); +} + #define BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM_LAST_FIELD value static int map_lookup_and_delete_elem(union bpf_attr *attr) @@ -3046,6 +3160,57 @@ static int bpf_task_fd_query(const union bpf_attr *attr, return err; } +#define BPF_MAP_BATCH_LAST_FIELD batch.flags + +#define BPF_DO_BATCH(fn) \ + do { \ + if (!fn) { \ + err = -ENOTSUPP; \ + goto err_put; \ + } \ + err = fn(map, attr, uattr); \ + } while (0) + +static int bpf_map_do_batch(const union bpf_attr *attr, + union bpf_attr __user *uattr, + int cmd) +{ + struct bpf_map *map; + int err, ufd; + struct fd f; + + if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_MAP_BATCH)) + return -EINVAL; + + ufd = attr->batch.map_fd; + f = fdget(ufd); + map = __bpf_map_get(f); + if (IS_ERR(map)) + return PTR_ERR(map); + + if ((cmd == BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH || + cmd == BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_BATCH) && + !(map_get_sys_perms(map, f) & FMODE_CAN_READ)) { + err = -EPERM; + goto err_put; + } + + if (cmd != BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH && + !(map_get_sys_perms(map, f) & FMODE_CAN_WRITE)) { + err = -EPERM; + goto err_put; + } + + if (cmd == BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH) + BPF_DO_BATCH(map->ops->map_lookup_batch); + else + BPF_DO_BATCH(map->ops->map_lookup_and_delete_batch); + +err_put: + fdput(f); + return err; +} + SYSCALL_DEFINE3(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf_attr __user *, uattr, unsigned int, size) { union bpf_attr attr = {}; @@ -3143,6 +3308,13 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf_attr __user *, uattr, unsigned int, siz case BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM: err = map_lookup_and_delete_elem(&attr); break; + case BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH: + err = bpf_map_do_batch(&attr, uattr, BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH); + break; + case BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_BATCH: + err = bpf_map_do_batch(&attr, uattr, + BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_BATCH); + break; default: err = -EINVAL; break; -- 2.24.1.735.g03f4e72817-goog