Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
        Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
        Kingdom.
        Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From:   David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgVpV-O4zeO+xOMcOUyKZi+1kg+6Kmi-P7SUx-ydZm5Og@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHk-=wgVpV-O4zeO+xOMcOUyKZi+1kg+6Kmi-P7SUx-ydZm5Og@mail.gmail.com> <157558502272.10278.8718685637610645781.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20191206135604.GB2734@twin.jikos.cz> <CAHk-=wiN_pWbcRaw5L-J2EFUyCn49Due0McwETKwmFFPp88K8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHk-=wjvO1V912ya=1rdXwrm1OBTi6GqnqryH_E8OR69cZuVOg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHk-=wizsHmCwUAyQKdU7hBPXHYQn-fOtJKBqMs-79br2pWxeQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHk-=wjeG0q1vgzu4iJhW5juPkTsjTYmiqiMUYAebWW+0bam6w@mail.gmail.com> <9417.1576097731@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     dhowells@redhat.com, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pipe: Fixes [ver #2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1416.1576136065.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 12 Dec 2019 07:34:25 +0000
Message-ID: <1417.1576136065@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> You are sure you won't want that for the notification queue cases? I
> guess they'll never want to "sync" part..

Actually, that's a good point, I do call it in post_one_notification() since I
have to hold the lock anyway.  But, as you say, I'm not sure whether I need
the sync variant.

David