Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp606037ybl; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 01:47:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxefl21KNaS3qSo9M7xwpu15txmZT2LeBTOjjzOXlPXoe1qHAYUVk1Wxy720AyMsLw7mWlZ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2306:: with SMTP id u6mr7579819ote.78.1576144065558; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 01:47:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1576144065; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Jp8C/wUxgRjArlLALZiaAIuMHwGxpf+GdHIw1adQs0xSWKPnprpbi23WIbEd1LF4Cy 10IMdgnrsK/enTthMh6xDNfbxyAUOy+XTfgbFq3LFcIix6KMve3W3V76ojSzlLYzeQyJ 7vM0kjI1f3rScWbGkFfke/e3m185t3T/n5Vum8S8dtUxVGRW3pb959aNo4nZg+tk59xV zPFVufcF8ezL/2vF7miqZjZyoEqSA5Pirfkc339kE/wifcPyeLJhnzYTRLNjUz4aayub ziwamRPBwKN39jTCO5VNs+5k2t0GGn069QvgSUogAGWyySY+ZLSQFt8vGc11H+tywwWZ 9e7Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=Te9J7l0E/1WrfQvEaZSUv6vm0Kj3+J/By+wbVPsUnig=; b=VKaqYI0ySqJMju8E1dNi5NooM6jtRUE9FWWgyM1vhzZgFd09Pgc3EhPj7Gle+nb7BZ JTxrLlueyeBtH2BY4ofl4E5GAq4t6c4MQ03gDmk+59PWpZYYpZIV99fYfuJSKeyTjl1X rKU4yZL/uGtxHadL6bYZbSrfk7ia49/z/vjVg5oB7Q34PqryE9Og8gvMrP2i+YdZCkv/ 3YBGltcCsncKeACy+WqqSYaI5wgzlVFNF4v0NWpgLxpZzkr+vunQK2Rn4RWO+d8P8255 qOJ+li3Nus5KUY5hg3BhOxaX7Eh9iZUhGWEXuZeydUJVD3FVlSrAwMgAnrKXU+AsOhTa 2+Ng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l8si2813464oii.249.2019.12.12.01.47.33; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 01:47:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728522AbfLLJpm (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 12 Dec 2019 04:45:42 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([85.220.165.71]:36187 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728261AbfLLJpl (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2019 04:45:41 -0500 Received: from kresse.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::2a]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ifL2O-0005Pq-4u; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:45:36 +0100 Message-ID: <7e13626ae46b6241549e33c983695bed316e9a6f.camel@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the imx-mxs tree From: Lucas Stach To: Shawn Guo , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:45:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20191212013323.GZ15858@dragon> References: <20191212083556.1b98ece7@canb.auug.org.au> <20191212013323.GZ15858@dragon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::2a X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: l.stach@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Shawn, On Do, 2019-12-12 at 09:33 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 08:35:56AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the imx-mxs tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > Sorry for the breakage. > [...] > > The warning was (probably) introduced by commit > > > > e79295edf1df ("ARM: dts: imx6: RDU2: link eDP bridge to panel") > > I have just taken these two commits out. The commit message of this change should maybe have been clearer, but the warning is expected. The bootloader fixes the DT before passing it on to Linux by completing the other direction of link if eDP is enabled. How do we want to handle this? If you totally dislike the warning I can get around it by not adding the link and adding some more complexity to the bootloader, but given the choice I would like to keep the incomplete link in the Linux DT and keep bootloader complexity down. Regards, Lucas