Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp984571ybl; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 07:59:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxyDojs2h0qEa296kUV2xty7AHARynWslL6r26bYjTZpdb40frlCvYwZ+uFdsyVqW1cjWsE X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4d01:: with SMTP id n1mr8292961otf.245.1576166350673; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 07:59:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1576166350; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wXRT9ljsYGB5OV88VjFzSlZQGLbA/aceIfweVAYxdZj9aPwabZ4wQ9snTbpMC+2P7c aVIiqXaxFMyI1wQf8E41cyElziOp+ftUudLeG9+veBWezg75FGjWlf3wfvKSGvdvKSbo TTKIwhY4f0qtps6wOwvEigSI3GXU1qu+A3z6OehRO9ubjpnyOQ48iwBAxLviM1TZjiOv 6tXdVQ6DscsMEvWdakYQAouZSqDRTKdAXzuf2KkPQ0+8g/UszF5Ct5hGRpem9er+scIF zpNghlrwoZN1EjPM5bkt37/BYTsrL/tPjxHQahWXwN0mLV+afyiqi22Ci+GafWQk0aT2 UNig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=rRNrufMF5ZmcT+/5HZMlWib9qPtBnpXc+naU09rmhxc=; b=Sxem1dyinz1GWaTPjp8TErWydq9F2dURzAtSOUcApUTlDGWvmXdSyNYYJ8uBRKpd1E xQEU6NSWvJzOhAnJF3ah7ZMdzOMGSUyrSHOCPjjwj4mqmBybcbNnKGyu4b7+ZLDdmatP ZL42HZID1fs1IlNvFF1oYmjx4mxOWeNZkt80pX6j4uJAUon6xRhZsScY9dvWO0o4v7/v sOmFXgMLtrlsOyOSWkAVJb6VT+fiF60w1G6sFLcGRkNcRGMbAnZzKfnNJwuvbP3is2Q6 WIO8h2wjdFtB86fU7aMKofxIx3M1isYsIwMgLwrEnr0jzO+YtqZK0GkyucQB9n6IYoK0 43wQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=eKGtPQFU; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k126si3395740oib.43.2019.12.12.07.58.58; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 07:59:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=eKGtPQFU; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729700AbfLLP5Y (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:57:24 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:35579 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729557AbfLLP5Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:57:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1576166243; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rRNrufMF5ZmcT+/5HZMlWib9qPtBnpXc+naU09rmhxc=; b=eKGtPQFUT0VBuUCexDwHiwsQrTlAnT5/gYDHwF+eydduyyF0vYDlw4iigBGNI8mwyby9UA WRhOtDoW0deEh+6l4c2QC5DVAoB6GTWANrb5raXHOKd5TXeGtQ0bRHb4CjnPELAiK8vDav 8/jAIm+ukJf5TlaMvWi6PcQwgLRzYpE= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-253-dQJico3HN1WsHV7UBQ8DOg-1; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:57:16 -0500 X-MC-Unique: dQJico3HN1WsHV7UBQ8DOg-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id u12so1196699wrt.15 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 07:57:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rRNrufMF5ZmcT+/5HZMlWib9qPtBnpXc+naU09rmhxc=; b=NR1IXo+pPTh871+f4oJ4CzZ2PCKKc4KSUXnHaIBTil6SCJbsq58ZgXHzkBAKnlq9jw jSR8IPv7Qfy6TME0TfHX31Ev5akt530rZAUBtdTYS0u3xmYVhthFMB7qtjiWeA65HjT4 EP6yK39a6gxDTGw6M2ASMjvluQsI1mifUEGLtwnIfF2kiT7vGrHsuhViliv+UpZvL9vf WZj44gxhcOCKR31lbumZuiX+AONF13f6zFI3PCexckhgXoszoeGmaVNV1IHTaDF1CFq1 r5VZpVOtvmpaDk5xnLa+cM5xUmWNdSq5iWtCmeHIn9BV9+ibamhg9x5Zt2lLncuqFAuk uKRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXvP9bdl0LlBeG9S0VEUo9cPv+0VzFQ4mkhWQz/lVi7aFLD8ITw PYU9EFuzSjrDe7UHtK4nKATwobYEn+y2npQszxixQjWhnKhL1gXTdyF6vH0Wt0n4PGRcBRgf7BY Je4jlV27ldq0XfXD40RO4WbiO X-Received: by 2002:adf:e6c6:: with SMTP id y6mr7226941wrm.284.1576166235413; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 07:57:15 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:adf:e6c6:: with SMTP id y6mr7226922wrm.284.1576166235182; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 07:57:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:e9bb:92e9:fcc3:7ba9? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:e9bb:92e9:fcc3:7ba9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s10sm6451431wrw.12.2019.12.12.07.57.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Dec 2019 07:57:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/19] x86/cpu: Print VMX flags in /proc/cpuinfo using VMX_FEATURES_* To: Liran Alon Cc: Borislav Petkov , Sean Christopherson , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Tony Luck , Tony W Wang-oc , Len Brown , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Jarkko Sakkinen References: <20191128014016.4389-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20191128014016.4389-12-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20191212122646.GE4991@zn.tnic> <4A24DE75-4E68-4EC6-B3F3-4ACB0EE82BF0@oracle.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <17c6569e-d0af-539c-6d63-f4c07367d8d1@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:57:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4A24DE75-4E68-4EC6-B3F3-4ACB0EE82BF0@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/12/19 16:52, Liran Alon wrote: >>> virt_apic_accesses -> vapic >> apicv > Frankly, I dislike APICv terminology. I prefer to enumerate the > various VMX features which are collectively called APICv by KVM. > APICv currently represents in KVM terminology the combination of > APIC-register virtualization, virtual-interrupt-delivery and > posted-interrupts (See cpu_has_vmx_apicv()). > > In fact, the coupling of “enable_apicv” module parameter have made me > multiple times to need to disable entire APICv features when there > for example was only a bug in posted-interrupts. > > Even you got confused as virtualize-apic-access is not part of KVM’s > APICv terminology but rather it’s enablement depend on > flexpriority_enabled (See cpu_need_virtualize_apic_accesses()). i.e. > It can be used for faster intercept handling of accesses to guest > xAPIC MMIO page. Right, I got confused with APIC-register virtualization. Virtualize APIC accesses is another one I wouldn't bother putting in /proc/cpuinfo, since it's usually present together with flexpriority. Paolo