Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751419AbWAWIUU (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:20:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751424AbWAWIUT (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:20:19 -0500 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.200]:18193 "EHLO xproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751419AbWAWIUS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:20:18 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RngfL9128IX5RskUMUOGQpWdjgW9/mK8dr46pbj50HkMwo9dPN9qWBIkNUyHjz+VCRhrZ+0d+Bly2BcZl7cFUZ6xafL8rQ6LKkl4HmQXJiXgPTKeA7qohqlLk7kxGBhBD3eSWgEypjD1Z31+lObfnk5y8OAWt5HvyhflYn6uVq8= Message-ID: <986ed62e0601230020g19dfe825r1b81a2bed411c1fc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:20:16 -0800 From: "Barry K. Nathan" To: Chase Venters Subject: Re: [RFC] VM: I have a dream... Cc: Michael Loftis , Al Boldi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200601222346.24781.chase.venters@clientec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <200601212108.41269.a1426z@gawab.com> <986ed62e0601221155x6a57e353vf14db02cc219c09@mail.gmail.com> <200601222346.24781.chase.venters@clientec.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1213 Lines: 24 On 1/22/06, Chase Venters wrote: > Just as a curiosity... does anyone have any guesses as to the runtime > performance cost of hosting one or more swap files (which thanks to on demand > creation and growth are presumably built of blocks scattered around the disk) > versus having one or more simple contiguous swap partitions? > > I think it's probably a given that swap partitions are better; I'm just > curious how much better they might actually be. If you google "mac os x swap partition", you'll find benchmarks from several years ago. (Although, those benchmarks are with a partition dedicated to the dynamically created swap files. It does more or less ensure that the files are contiguous though.) Mac OS X was *much* more of a dog back then, in terms of performance, so I don't know how relevant those benchmarks are nowadays, but it might be a starting point for answering your question. -- -Barry K. Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/