Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 03:24:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 03:24:34 -0500 Received: from ozone.fmi.fi ([193.166.223.16]:38697 "EHLO ozone.fmi.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 03:24:22 -0500 From: "Kari E. Hurtta" Message-Id: <200011110823.eAB8Nxc354799@ozone.fmi.fi> Subject: [OFF] Load avarage (Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue) In-Reply-To: <20001110142547.F16213@sendmail.com> "from Claus Assmann at Nov 10, 2000 02:25:47 pm" To: sendmail Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 10:23:58 +0200 (EET) CC: David Lang , "Jeff V. Merkey" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: sendmail X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL83 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Claus Assmann: > Why does Linux report a LA of 10 if there are only two processes > running? [This goes out of subject] I have learned that load avarage means "Processes on run queue" + "process waiting disk (or short-term) I/O" That was before Linux times. I have seen a workstation go to show load-average 100. That happened when NFS-server (or network) died. These workstations were diskless, so all processes ended to waiting of "disk" I/O. These were Sun's diskless workstation models. So it is not new that load average includes something else than processes waiting for CPU. / Kari Hurtta (That was on Computer Science department of University of Helsinki.) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/