Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932463AbWAWTwW (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:52:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932464AbWAWTwW (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:52:22 -0500 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:46292 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932463AbWAWTwV (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:52:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43D28189.3080407@argo.co.il> To: Avi Kivity Cc: Al Boldi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC] VM: I have a dream... X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.2CF1 June 9, 2003 Message-ID: From: Bryan Henderson Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:52:13 -0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML604/01/M/IBM(Release 7.0HF124 | January 12, 2006) at 01/23/2006 14:52:14, Serialize complete at 01/23/2006 14:52:14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1977 Lines: 40 >Perhaps you'd be interested in single-level store architectures, where >no distinction is made between memory and storage. IBM uses it in one >(or maybe more) of their systems. It's the IBM Eserver I Series, nee System/38 (A.D. 1980), aka AS/400. It was expected at one time to be the next generation of computer architecture, but it turned out that the computing world had matured to the point that it was more important to be backward compatible than to push frontiers. The single 128 bit address space addresses every byte of information in the system. The underlying system keeps the majority of it on disk, and the logic that loads stuff into electronic memory when it has to be there is below the level that any ordinary program would see, much like the logic in an IA32 CPU that loads stuff into processor cache. It's worth noting that nowhere in an I Series machine is a layer that looks like a CPU Linux runs on; it's designed for single level storage from the gates on up through the operating system. I found Al's dream rather vague, which explains why several people inferred different ideas from it (and then beat them down). It sort of sounds like single level storage, but also like virtual memory and like mmap. I assume it's actually supposed to be something different from all those. I personally have set my sights further down the road: I want an address space that addresses every byte of information in the universe, not just "in" a computer system. And the infrastructure should move it around among various media for optimal access without me worrying about it. -- Bryan Henderson IBM Almaden Research Center San Jose CA Filesystems - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/