Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2153741ybl; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:54:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwQM3U1y0muYFf0zQPBL8WeY+xiNERnJ9VXri6MHDJ+sJYn7wn04KynaqvabSg3Uiux726K X-Received: by 2002:a9d:48a:: with SMTP id 10mr9108866otm.95.1576774492485; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:54:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1576774492; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eyk8cX8Y57YaZcTfk1/tvY+A8KAxzdy3f5w1S/4d1Q8ypqI/TUQZfktetxx68T34Vz 3wEKHT9eoyszmEnpLoIkocH+Bes92nkn/AgW7Md0B0xL169EsBSUdu0GAkgtdL07od1n MVRMNlvIR7MgknhwKxZlJEnAlE/AgNTX6cxFAixS2f9pDhRaq87IiCv9zzF/fhN3mRHx qwYKp4xDDxCAxCPBw5V70CIXZ8DgtvdZXfH0xjMWQ2iLnMiL173bA3DqyKlPKzJfvx2h PNxTR2bAXgEMf/3TI4uyx9UwBX76zzM1+98eE8XhqiRDQDVQhchccU4t8IbMv2PzijSb A7+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=dkiQz+fAYZhJkkOBSUmbdTeJBLwCOCfR/hVEIEVh7CQ=; b=02XVjkr/DJQzWiJu9KKKI1Tx1EgqSU7okeDQJ+/zcz556ZzXekckHKmlGlLCm8usQ/ o9vWT3eIKlsh4L+/v0grDuvre0sM8snyejxzi3mPfkStlStdwX7FZ3CHITjTZuRnEIsy 47+TGNkVJIy5TXKSw0gs8M+ENbgXJQIEt0BvqcfSD0UszGPiuXs4dKi1nzla1ARsPmAW Bch1M2FvNu5v4Ko5q/rOv3yJMnEx+1VLnXq6L9Wpbv+WqWZG1rq9+JbKRzb4MnpYfMAc QBPARk5JeZ82KX3k4HzY0CGyFH90xsK5eP9Xm8nvtx/NCl5k5A9pjxV7aeBK25TYhgEs /gZw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d20si3188339otq.157.2019.12.19.08.54.39; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:54:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726943AbfLSQx7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 19 Dec 2019 11:53:59 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:37284 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726855AbfLSQx7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2019 11:53:59 -0500 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8DD92E5; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:53:56 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: "Daniel W. S. Almeida" Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: filesystems: convert fuse to RST Message-ID: <20191219095356.4a3ad965@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20191120192655.33709-1-dwlsalmeida@gmail.com> References: <20191120192655.33709-1-dwlsalmeida@gmail.com> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:26:55 -0300 "Daniel W. S. Almeida" wrote: > From: "Daniel W. S. Almeida" > > > Converts fuse.txt to reStructuredText format, improving the presentation > without changing much of the underlying content. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel W. S. Almeida > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Changes in v2: > -Copied FUSE maintainer (Miklos Szeredi) > -Fixed the reference in the MAINTAINERS file > -Removed some of the excessive markup in fuse.rst > -Moved fuse.rst into admin-guide > -Updated index.rst So I have to confess that I've lost track of where we stand with this. Holidays and moving house will do that...apologies. In any case, I have a couple of additional comments. [...] > -There's a control filesystem for FUSE, which can be mounted by: > +There's a control filesystem for FUSE, which can be mounted by: :: > > mount -t fusectl none /sys/fs/fuse/connections Please just do "...can be mounted by::"; it will do what you want. > -Mounting it under the '/sys/fs/fuse/connections' directory makes it > +Mounting it under the ``'/sys/fs/fuse/connections'`` directory makes it There's still a lot of extra markup, and this seems like *way* too many quotes... > -INTERRUPT requests take precedence over other requests, so the > +*INTERRUPT* requests take precedence over other requests, so the > userspace filesystem will receive queued INTERRUPTs before any others. Not sure you need to add that markup either, but beyond that... > -The userspace filesystem may ignore the INTERRUPT requests entirely, > -or may honor them by sending a reply to the _original_ request, with > -the error set to EINTR. > +The userspace filesystem may ignore the *INTERRUPT* requests entirely, > +or may honor them by sending a reply to the *original* request, with > +the error set to ``EINTR``. > > It is also possible that there's a race between processing the > original request and its INTERRUPT request. There are two possibilities: > > - 1) The INTERRUPT request is processed before the original request is > + #. The *INTERRUPT* request is processed before the original request is > processed > > - 2) The INTERRUPT request is processed after the original request has > + #. The *INTERRUPT* request is processed after the original request has > been answered > > If the filesystem cannot find the original request, it should wait for > some timeout and/or a number of new requests to arrive, after which it > -should reply to the INTERRUPT request with an EAGAIN error. In case > -1) the INTERRUPT request will be requeued. In case 2) the INTERRUPT > +should reply to the INTERRUPT request with an ``EAGAIN`` error. In case > +1) the ``INTERRUPT`` request will be requeued. In case 2) the ``INTERRUPT`` > reply will be ignored. Here you are marking up the same term in a different way. That can only create confusion, which is generally not the goal for the docs. Please make another pass and try to get the markup down to a minimum; remember that the plain-text reading experience matters too. Thanks, jon