Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030239AbWAXAkH (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:40:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030240AbWAXAkG (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:40:06 -0500 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:43403 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030239AbWAXAkF (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:40:05 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: "Ray Bryant" Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:39:46 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: "Dave McCracken" , "Robin Holt" , "Hugh Dickins" , "Linux Kernel" , "Linux Memory Management" References: <200601231758.08397.raybry@mpdtxmail.amd.com> <200601231816.38942.raybry@mpdtxmail.amd.com> In-Reply-To: <200601231816.38942.raybry@mpdtxmail.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601240139.46751.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 926 Lines: 23 On Tuesday 24 January 2006 01:16, Ray Bryant wrote: > On Monday 23 January 2006 17:58, Ray Bryant wrote: > > > > ... And what kind of alignment constraints do we end up > > under in order to make the sharing happen? (My guess would be that there > > aren't any such constraints (well, page alignment.. :-) if we are just > > sharing pte's.) > > > > Oh, obviously that is not right as you have to share full pte pages. So on > x86_64 I'm guessing one needs 2MB alignment in order to get the sharing to > kick in, since a pte page maps 512 pages of 4 KB each. The new randomized mmaps will likely actively sabotate such alignment. I just added them for x86-64. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/