Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030283AbWAXBZt (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:25:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030284AbWAXBZt (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:25:49 -0500 Received: from omta02ps.mx.bigpond.com ([144.140.83.154]:63626 "EHLO omta02ps.mx.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030283AbWAXBZt (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:25:49 -0500 Message-ID: <43D5821A.7050001@bigpond.net.au> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:25:46 +1100 From: Peter Williams User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Bligh CC: Con Kolivas , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andy Whitcroft Subject: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench References: <43C45BDC.1050402@google.com> <43C5BD8F.3000307@bigpond.net.au> <43C5BE4A.9030105@google.com> <200601121739.17886.kernel@kolivas.org> <43D52E6F.7040808@google.com> In-Reply-To: <43D52E6F.7040808@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at omta02ps.mx.bigpond.com from [147.10.133.38] using ID pwil3058@bigpond.net.au at Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:25:46 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1422 Lines: 40 Martin Bligh wrote: > >> Thanks and looks like the results are in from 2.6.14-rc2-mm1 with the >> patch backed out. >> >> Drumroll.... >> >> http://test.kernel.org/perf/kernbench.moe.png >> >> The performance goes back to a range similar to 2.6.14-rc1-mm1 (see >> 2.6.14-rc2-mm1 + 20328 in blue). Unfortunately this does implicate >> this patch. Can we put it back into -mm only and allow Peter's >> tweaks/fixes to go on top and have it tested some more before going >> upstream? > > > Hmm. Looks like we didn't get this as fixed up as I thought. Moe seems > to be fixed (16x NUMA-Q), but elm3b132 is not (it's 4x, flat SMP ia32). > Look at the latest graphs .... > > Is it possible it only got fixed for NUMA boxes? It should be totally independent. But anyhow, I can't see the problem. The only numbers that I can see for 2.6.16-rc1-mm[1|2] (which are the ones with the latest fix) on this graph are approx. 101 which is much the same as the best of the rest. Or have I missed something? Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/