Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030324AbWAXEcw (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:32:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030325AbWAXEcw (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:32:52 -0500 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:14285 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1030324AbWAXEcv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:32:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:33:02 -0800 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: David =?ISO-8859-1?B?SORyZGVtYW4=?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/04] Add encryption ops to the keyctl syscall Message-Id: <20060123203302.3bc01aa9.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <1138048952965@2gen.com> References: <11380489523918@2gen.com> <1138048952965@2gen.com> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 548 Lines: 16 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:42:32 +0100 David H?rdeman wrote: > > Changes the keyctl syscall to accept six arguments (is it valid to do so?) > and adds encryption as one of the supported ops for in-kernel keys. Does this say anything about the amount of syscall testing that this code has had? --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/