Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030481AbWAXNxp (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:53:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030482AbWAXNxp (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:53:45 -0500 Received: from spirit.analogic.com ([204.178.40.4]:1543 "EHLO spirit.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030481AbWAXNxo convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:53:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jan 2006 13:53:41.0485 (UTC) FILETIME=[958A61D0:01C620ED] Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: GPL V3 and Linux Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:53:40 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: GPL V3 and Linux Thread-Index: AcYg7ZWR6l5oMw1CR3+3wU2szKLMhg== References: From: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" To: "David Schwartz" Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" Reply-To: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2550 Lines: 52 On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, David Schwartz wrote: > >> Sometimes the restrictions are necessary. For instance, >> except in very special circumstances, governments usually >> take away the inherent rights to kill, etc. > > I guess I can't figure out what you could possibly mean by the word "right" > such that the phrase "inherent rights to kill" is meaningful. Perhaps you > could clarify. > > DS Simple, from Government 101. Suppose you start a new country unencumbered with rules and laws. You have "total" freedom, therefore all rights. Because you believe that everybody is "good" (you decide what that means) and would, therefore, never do anything "bad", you don't need any laws. Sooner or later somebody does something "bad" (like kills somebody). So, you make a law against killing. As you make that first law, you have restricted rights. That's what laws do, they restrict rights. Unfortunately, it never stops with the "obviously necessary" laws. Eventually, every time somebody believes he or she has been harmed somehow, the cry goes out; "There ought to be a law....". Some goody-twoshoes in the government makes a new law. Eventually, there are so many laws that there is no freedom whatsoever. Most laws, designed to protect, have far-reaching consequences that actually cause more problems than they are supposed to solve. That's the nature of Law and Government in general. That's why it's important to control (reduce) the number of laws that exist and control the size of government. Of course, once the government controls the schools all is lost. Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.6.13.4 on an i686 machine (5589.54 BogoMips). Warning : 98.36% of all statistics are fiction. . **************************************************************** The information transmitted in this message is confidential and may be privileged. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Analogic Corporation immediately - by replying to this message or by sending an email to DeliveryErrors@analogic.com - and destroy all copies of this information, including any attachments, without reading or disclosing them. Thank you. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/