Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 20 Dec 2019 19:48:16 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@zhaoxin.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/19] x86/cpu: Print VMX flags in /proc/cpuinfo using
 VMX_FEATURES_*
Message-ID: <20191221034816.GC22351@linux.intel.com>
References: <20191128014016.4389-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
 <20191128014016.4389-12-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
 <20191212122646.GE4991@zn.tnic>
 <d0b21e7e-69f5-09f9-3e1c-14d49fa42b9f@redhat.com>
 <20191212181802.GH3163@linux.intel.com>
 <2d6c0344-ccfa-13fc-695b-1e69298507dc@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2d6c0344-ccfa-13fc-695b-1e69298507dc@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 07:23:46PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/12/19 19:18, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Using v<feature> across the board makes sense to keep things consistent,
> > i.e. vnmi, vtpr, vapic, etc...
> > 
> > Anyone have thoughts on how to shorten "APIC-register virtualization"
> > without colliding with vapic or apicv?  I currently have apic_reg_virt,
> > which is a bit wordy.  apic_regv isn't awful, but I don't love it.
> 
> Perhaps vapic_access and vapic_register?

I ended up going with vapic and vapic_reg, figured everyone looking at
this knows what "reg" is short for, and I like the progression shown by
vapic -> vapic_reg.