Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp4415399ybl; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 06:16:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxEc5RRVPj2w5Z3jWIyUZgYl92sl2t3k5r8SUcF+/OH5ZIn2eHkadUJtB4Bs/7WdsETADIj X-Received: by 2002:aca:ed81:: with SMTP id l123mr5247554oih.129.1576937765337; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 06:16:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1576937765; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TjCGPN/2xeiZXY8Pmi3jNIgr75qlcYztA1mOl/VzwS6bjrc3OVWVN30IMOmHiN4r4H 2D/Q3EOyo0oLZwzCDUj4fa1S9gjbk5dpSrKN5+ZM1yCrMxwpXkY2EYP7nGh6B2iiSkuq AzRFYTBc+N6VfjJgxQTZAkgrKKCu7ETPG3pWWNUFQS6yZ0npb62xmyAQQnPurU+LuuU5 qANHzbSQWEL8dkAyZpplffNJb5k6k7aRsLOJddBx1T6tsATLCTUAbn+/nXsF9OV4IRw9 wBdMjmsTgd7xsmG/0w9x+bwCH29zlXhXmD6RbgGo4GckzN9dWqsCMSpwI4xaamL77jhd 6PoA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=8BH/SyXLFZCLtqMrDjK+CFykhHP2ZY6HLDrr9XhEmGk=; b=u9ozzOQkk+BbwL9T5Fa9ez5FmNlzwRj4Ydc5hdalOx7U/2NgoP9yHJGADfW88yXSTi 84pxhcX6wUSGrlaoNf5qXgMqcAGAQZB9UAyVxgkf8LbOEIQW5WmqCwf8t+sMoMxouyNX BEZz8oNYufdxZkk5lSj9zTJMkNL8HcV5/vwtcPYbvKExnctu+J0Um7q8zCkN+IkTIdII +kF/TpZKo/1xt5u5dbuxMHvSLC1gdU8oT3kRg3P3BlizC7LAwR80DTQKnZPchtKfhTXh WI3BL/VstEtTQvJOdRE0EJ+vS97eGI8gPf8G60EdWSpyJAnuVzNk7iXMaVA3pm1v/OVm lu7A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j71si6521190oib.213.2019.12.21.06.15.54; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 06:16:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727052AbfLUONc (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 21 Dec 2019 09:13:32 -0500 Received: from inca-roads.misterjones.org ([213.251.177.50]:39526 "EHLO inca-roads.misterjones.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726650AbfLUONb (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Dec 2019 09:13:31 -0500 Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why) by cheepnis.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iifVX-0004U0-4h; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 15:13:27 +0100 Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 14:13:25 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: Andrew Murray Cc: Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , will@kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , , kvmarm , linux-arm-kernel , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/18] arm64: KVM: enable conditional save/restore full SPE profiling buffer controls Message-ID: <20191221141325.5a177343@why> In-Reply-To: <20191220143025.33853-10-andrew.murray@arm.com> References: <20191220143025.33853-1-andrew.murray@arm.com> <20191220143025.33853-10-andrew.murray@arm.com> Organization: Approximate X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: andrew.murray@arm.com, Catalin.Marinas@arm.com, Mark.Rutland@arm.com, will@kernel.org, Sudeep.Holla@arm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cheepnis.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:30:16 +0000 Andrew Murray wrote: [somehow managed not to do a reply all, re-sending] > From: Sudeep Holla > > Now that we can save/restore the full SPE controls, we can enable it > if SPE is setup and ready to use in KVM. It's supported in KVM only if > all the CPUs in the system supports SPE. > > However to support heterogenous systems, we need to move the check if > host supports SPE and do a partial save/restore. No. Let's just not go down that path. For now, KVM on heterogeneous systems do not get SPE. If SPE has been enabled on a guest and a CPU comes up without SPE, this CPU should fail to boot (same as exposing a feature to userspace). > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla > Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++----------------- > include/kvm/arm_spe.h | 6 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c > index 12429b212a3a..d8d857067e6d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c > @@ -86,18 +86,13 @@ > } > > static void __hyp_text > -__debug_save_spe_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, bool full_ctxt) > +__debug_save_spe_context(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, bool full_ctxt) > { > u64 reg; > > /* Clear pmscr in case of early return */ > ctxt->sys_regs[PMSCR_EL1] = 0; > > - /* SPE present on this CPU? */ > - if (!cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(read_sysreg(id_aa64dfr0_el1), > - ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_SHIFT)) > - return; > - > /* Yes; is it owned by higher EL? */ > reg = read_sysreg_s(SYS_PMBIDR_EL1); > if (reg & BIT(SYS_PMBIDR_EL1_P_SHIFT)) > @@ -142,7 +137,7 @@ __debug_save_spe_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, bool full_ctxt) > } > > static void __hyp_text > -__debug_restore_spe_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, bool full_ctxt) > +__debug_restore_spe_context(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, bool full_ctxt) > { > if (!ctxt->sys_regs[PMSCR_EL1]) > return; > @@ -210,11 +205,14 @@ void __hyp_text __debug_restore_guest_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > struct kvm_guest_debug_arch *host_dbg; > struct kvm_guest_debug_arch *guest_dbg; > > + host_ctxt = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context); > + guest_ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt; > + > + __debug_restore_spe_context(guest_ctxt, kvm_arm_spe_v1_ready(vcpu)); > + > if (!(vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY)) > return; > > - host_ctxt = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context); > - guest_ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt; > host_dbg = &vcpu->arch.host_debug_state.regs; > guest_dbg = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.debug_ptr); > > @@ -232,8 +230,7 @@ void __hyp_text __debug_restore_host_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > host_ctxt = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context); > guest_ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt; > > - if (!has_vhe()) > - __debug_restore_spe_nvhe(host_ctxt, false); > + __debug_restore_spe_context(host_ctxt, kvm_arm_spe_v1_ready(vcpu)); So you now do an unconditional save/restore on the exit path for VHE as well? Even if the host isn't using the SPE HW? That's not acceptable as, in most cases, only the host /or/ the guest will use SPE. Here, you put a measurable overhead on each exit. If the host is not using SPE, then the restore/save should happen in vcpu_load/vcpu_put. Only if the host is using SPE should you do something in the run loop. Of course, this only applies to VHE and non-VHE must switch eagerly. > > if (!(vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY)) > return; > @@ -249,19 +246,21 @@ void __hyp_text __debug_restore_host_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > void __hyp_text __debug_save_host_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - /* > - * Non-VHE: Disable and flush SPE data generation > - * VHE: The vcpu can run, but it can't hide. > - */ > struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt; > > host_ctxt = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context); > - if (!has_vhe()) > - __debug_save_spe_nvhe(host_ctxt, false); > + if (cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(read_sysreg(id_aa64dfr0_el1), > + ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_SHIFT)) > + __debug_save_spe_context(host_ctxt, kvm_arm_spe_v1_ready(vcpu)); > } > > void __hyp_text __debug_save_guest_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > + bool kvm_spe_ready = kvm_arm_spe_v1_ready(vcpu); > + > + /* SPE present on this vCPU? */ > + if (kvm_spe_ready) > + __debug_save_spe_context(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, kvm_spe_ready); > } > > u32 __hyp_text __kvm_get_mdcr_el2(void) > diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_spe.h b/include/kvm/arm_spe.h > index 48d118fdb174..30c40b1bc385 100644 > --- a/include/kvm/arm_spe.h > +++ b/include/kvm/arm_spe.h > @@ -16,4 +16,10 @@ struct kvm_spe { > bool irq_level; > }; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_SPE > +#define kvm_arm_spe_v1_ready(v) ((v)->arch.spe.ready) > +#else > +#define kvm_arm_spe_v1_ready(v) (false) > +#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_ARM_SPE */ > + > #endif /* __ASM_ARM_KVM_SPE_H */ Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...