Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp6424423ybl; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 05:44:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxlNRvVIf4Ww4h2zloOmL7KmARZXaUTJjJHT+NtCLj55REhQ5lNGiNC6XYnWxrqq5p0ikBG X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7a97:: with SMTP id l23mr28703219otn.34.1577108698596; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 05:44:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1577108698; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yrHWekmISHfHh37OsjSsRmcPYtb+6ANoDt/Ipcz6fXhT7reHWZoAgabXjw1EKXQrcg QiSDOIwHD4QOFKwFrZ81d7XccUE4+LhVKUNMVAHcQsHXmcdo2E164ToFYbl5l13UaJhi PHSKM8xUrf1+JMzYSVV65VAQ70NL+7nrOxdWRP5r0LdttLNjqYwKp2NzKo+/0JHZxNKy cHa/PEdtRs07eVoK+Q8wzT1FWpK2PLnG0/8cDGuYrdYW0yRJdUO3ziESflRPLGNV5wHu 3nKdtt5C7pFtWRTa5myT7ebQUlMtqZGBxVTiXbJWV6iYkpB8tI1Owrlwa0QdXqGeupKN lqUw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=gO4ZYprbvPJJ6mkGGX2V4nV7kaxtZXWoHRJLamoPyyQ=; b=sBJLK6w3ESMXjwHf+ganaHrLX8UbV+tKVwg/1WCH/k9FqmEXfd/tMrDJHERsEywrEt BGXYeJ5+qt3nubTgpFspvpLWxEZkbj36JZQD2cnGiMZM09I/2X7cc2VDObbyOtD9v/r2 mqiDj3RQudIGuBkaDRhnAtclch3l3eWF1ChSvLIY19lJzUtCiMPT6IuoEtvUrqu7Stj6 l9ZiTVznz3ccbSddBGMV8cYDBxJEZ/aIpfD0ZaOXbJEbDqK2EFJPLLUfL0cp2GpukRdF ZJEOtNKAzU/6u+7SSDigS3GPqD6P5gp0qrGjpkeSKUlOgUQ6I5Pk5X8DD5eUDWAX68Eb +7Iw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m25si10181264otn.208.2019.12.23.05.44.46; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 05:44:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726846AbfLWNoB (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 Dec 2019 08:44:01 -0500 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:46090 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726676AbfLWNoA (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Dec 2019 08:44:00 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 1E959C499F930DB2F9D9; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 21:43:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.173.222.27) by DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 21:43:44 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Handle GICR_PENDBASER.PTZ filed as RAZ To: CC: , , , , , References: <20191220111833.1422-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com> From: Zenghui Yu Message-ID: <3a729559-d0eb-e042-d6bd-b69bacb0dd23@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 21:43:42 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191220111833.1422-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.173.222.27] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/12/20 19:18, Zenghui Yu wrote: > Although guest will hardly read and use the PTZ (Pending Table Zero) > bit in GICR_PENDBASER, let us emulate the architecture strictly. > As per IHI 0069E 9.11.30, PTZ field is WO, and reads as 0. > > Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu > --- > > Noticed when checking all fields of GICR_PENDBASER register. > But _not_ sure whether it's worth a fix, as Linux never sets > the PTZ bit before enabling LPI (set GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS). > > And I wonder under which scenarios can this bit be written as 1. > It seems difficult for software to determine whether the pending > table contains all zeros when writing this bit. > > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c > index 7dfd15dbb308..ebc218840fc2 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c > @@ -414,8 +414,11 @@ static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_pendbase(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > gpa_t addr, unsigned int len) > { > struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu; > + u64 value = vgic_cpu->pendbaser; > > - return extract_bytes(vgic_cpu->pendbaser, addr & 7, len); > + value &= ~GICR_PENDBASER_PTZ; > + > + return extract_bytes(value, addr & 7, len); > } > > static void vgic_mmio_write_pendbase(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > I noticed there is no userspace access callbacks for GICR_PENDBASER, so this patch will make the PTZ field also 'Read As Zero' by userspace. Should we consider adding a uaccess_read callback for GICR_PENDBASER which just returns the unchanged vgic_cpu->pendbaser to userspace? (Though this is really not a big deal. We now always emulate the PTZ field to guest as RAZ. And 'vgic_cpu->pendbaser & GICR_PENDBASER_PTZ' only indicates whether KVM will optimize the LPI enabling process, where Read As Zero indicates never optimize..) Thanks, Zenghui