Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp6885286ybl; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 14:02:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz1cgnoprmYDMBOdGEfWxL4UL8EFZWCoVQroGvm9MR755uv6zZrKf+bpZEyrhiNinMmwu2c X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3bc4:: with SMTP id k62mr24382035otc.186.1577138523451; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 14:02:03 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1577138523; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nwW/g//gwoLwHawUgtjTDTARVoMVL0ADAUoYhzNbnXdxWnbo6g9qYnwcWOBd20dva2 MyGCFd1x2tU3RYW5+Mksh9fNoxU5PmgEOgOjt4iIkBT6yTW5kPnHNiWx1SRcBfz2JNGs Q9DIwfQ/z/tq1skoHPgQB085e8hx6j9oLnkQz4EYbOodJ86+Na8FdXzp1hSnNPDZ+QLU 8HE5XZmvbQ15CqIlpf1oQMxq6BLB6c7wbu4GSruBdrcvZY3+uaVx0aOMvE8eE2us+c5g nuOepFSAizRpYMKkDeYbBEWHK7b2oiwqK2QkY57hbtdQYnjwB4QOA7SHuSdmXv7M2V1t VStw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=BLNaES/5faB7CDH1Cg3Gzds59nnNws0xm1GMy6FEyQY=; b=jKpkKXgtJNvrh3TsJetkWyoTQTNfQwTTJx8f3oCkVO38l1l7OeQ+bbo+fIuhsQzUwU 0bbK8sOuOSQSG7dJioSh/BCNWJbYrRN2LsY4wewJWl26ylXYY/9KPbsA0vBl10AVYAM6 Rh5gagsOlT6Z+idsty7Ia5QZv9BAGVhCREWPm09ZbtpXdTZfQvzoH7Rf/aDdNYKyLhru 0V7ZH8+qi9qN4jxsnTnMtoRuNNNjNv0xnn9gV+bDJde/nB7v5lBqZbiT16mLNxHF4WKc qGDkknOHq6CPzESGXZE/+PnWDtB7dK6ljl283MFAsogvA/p8ur5QTXD931UOXcUqftbC ygnQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p11si11099126ota.300.2019.12.23.14.01.50; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 14:02:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726880AbfLWV7R (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:59:17 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:7875 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726817AbfLWV7Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:59:16 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Dec 2019 13:59:16 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,349,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="207395090" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Dec 2019 13:59:15 -0800 Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 05:59:14 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Wei Yang , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/rmap.c: split huge pmd when it really is Message-ID: <20191223215914.GA5156@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20191223022435.30653-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <20191223171653.xy2ri52xymkwm3ov@box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191223171653.xy2ri52xymkwm3ov@box> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 08:16:53PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: >On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 10:24:35AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >> There are two cases to call try_to_unmap_one() with TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD >> set: >> >> * unmap_page() >> * shrink_page_list() >> >> In both case, the page passed to try_to_unmap_one() is PageHead() of the >> THP. If this page's mapping address in process is not HPAGE_PMD_SIZE >> aligned, this means the THP is not mapped as PMD THP in this process. >> This could happen when we do mremap() a PMD size range to an un-aligned >> address. >> >> Currently, this case is handled by following check in __split_huge_pmd() >> luckily. >> >> page != pmd_page(*pmd) >> >> This patch checks the address to skip some hard work. > >Do you see some measurable performance improvement? rmap is heavy enough >and I expect this kind of overhead to be within noise level. > >I don't have anything agains the check, but it complicates the picture. > >And if we are going this path, it worth also check if the vma is long >enough to hold huge page. > >And I don't see why the check cannot be done inside split_huge_pmd_address(). > Ok, let me put the check into split_huge_pmd_address(). >-- > Kirill A. Shutemov -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me