Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 24 Dec 2019 11:04:23 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@chromium.org>
Cc:     kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, kristen@linux.intel.com,
        keescook@chromium.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
        "VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@vmware.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 10/11] x86/paravirt: Adapt assembly for PIE support
Message-ID: <20191224100423.GC21017@zn.tnic>
References: <20191205000957.112719-1-thgarnie@chromium.org>
 <20191205000957.112719-11-thgarnie@chromium.org>
 <20191223172350.GH16710@zn.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191223172350.GH16710@zn.tnic>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 06:23:50PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 04:09:47PM -0800, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> > If PIE is enabled, switch the paravirt assembly constraints to be
> > compatible. The %c/i constrains generate smaller code so is kept by
> > default.
> > 
> > Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extend the
> > KASLR randomization range below 0xffffffff80000000.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@chromium.org>
> > Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> More missed feedback:
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAJcbSZG-JhBC9b1JMv1zq2r5uRQipYLtkNjM67sd7=eqy_iOaA@mail.gmail.com

Whoops, it is in the comment above PARAVIRT_CALL_POST. I must've been
blind yesterday. Forget what I said and sorry.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette