Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp7881929ybl; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:50:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy+qSumTfe6iiSFsdirKjpuRA177gRwOFx2wF6GrnrpPW4QcG3ZHnF9gbOk4Va76kZvoaLQ X-Received: by 2002:a9d:8f1:: with SMTP id 104mr36344186otf.107.1577213442111; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:50:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1577213442; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gd+FAP2yS5SS/Nd+OXEVcludY+rx99wGAjbdGaGEGb46BM9ivPZ65nERlg2z/Dfpes v5DCMhPg0uy1RVz1fbofDTsCsWzuNEsr0TjBcJ13bZk8+86HcfSzRb3AomXA9lWugkxU NkobDjU7fO+OHP+mZXCBG7utU9VJLQdzhqBGkReXaAa8ioxBGSms1i0TALHGc03FKWcp vTCRjw0GxmIx7/5Mp819ZdHpT/MqwwMZMDALQXC6dNYVrlq0EWC2LhVVuX35fhY50Tj0 xdu6Sm1JJxEQn0eJK/m9WtKJWmhjOgev7J88m72dCHW7NtekLkqpW6aBcC21DzSgUDDk GblA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:date:from:dkim-signature; bh=lWn5lG1lm71cwDo15yx9m3Zo5kwANx7q2As8ujx/+8M=; b=Vhg5l/gQBFmssBP7/Ib87u9lB4HR4+25+bI0wCfpDAF9nTgd4aLhmz4Grexv2z7mFU nqJSbNWRK0MK9LwfILIN5fGYjipMbBQG7dFF15u++P0tdUYhKxKY6GLBoMQSp9PqE3r/ QtS99TvDyPmf1q8LgrPyWyBG8Lr4sw5R+/OqmIRlwLLJTynnHJQtsFOu+AHNOIEHM8CR 41dHFgmR4peKbE+rDmaDS0UxoC4xQbCMVM034fCXXxvwyqN8YbBrbLeJXszybMIY2Urc oFpI/79v0KCAeCJbKaCd83Sd0hdTYvye5QSDP0EPRBqZjsD8xzBDXIkraPKu3CNXZ/Hp YtDQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="BXdL/rij"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 3si6152410otz.198.2019.12.24.10.50.30; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:50:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="BXdL/rij"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726262AbfLXStx (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 24 Dec 2019 13:49:53 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f67.google.com ([209.85.167.67]:42885 "EHLO mail-lf1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726184AbfLXStx (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Dec 2019 13:49:53 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f67.google.com with SMTP id y19so15619807lfl.9; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:49:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=lWn5lG1lm71cwDo15yx9m3Zo5kwANx7q2As8ujx/+8M=; b=BXdL/rijyVZCACaMXJD0dON+UYD7AWBhrRNXvpLvby8tHu3kIC/vQgf+nDvupD3ORA wF0GxTbPYQLye/oZE04zLXZ8so0QiRHQeSJVW5jtbVyghCEDjgCFXEJ6lBv7JX6xX5GD x3gooA/KHSkBahceOOg1HO4eVx0ndOcId0FRmUAc0VCzMWtdpukzaWh0d0Rij2+53kWU xISo0e1KOpUG0C7TO2GkVpJtvf63aGaDOwwLRF9HlO4qN7w9Tc9eFar17akS1pUmejEL sT2NQwyLXe1Q6tn6Z63Zxjo7aTtndzXPNxtNZMHMqgt3B3wq8fMZdNcruBdxP8PE/IH3 h5eQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=lWn5lG1lm71cwDo15yx9m3Zo5kwANx7q2As8ujx/+8M=; b=ZhwjedrKJxnYiCxHxfxsdyXY4ROzBcINW9lzooe41JSi1pF5FaDVjHNdLMO3BHFE4T bBq871UA20tUuIVGzqBBxO/XC2yRJReFjpbmGfh5s9+pzInlf2X9r7Kw5LqQS91pAIqg ff2faXj1DJHignwrX6QoYj93yiRYoEVpFNqWDdCcyv8PBCpbcH5e68ddjwDuufEmh0n1 qNEMd+28CH8zat55nvtRCS2PiL4J+Ca/uVPB0kkdzryDWIFHyOPFg/w2i0+HZoOb59Yv eK5OrxeADWoP9JVrB1fdWhHdJuiajPMNl0FCkHq3Hm28QC/jIHRU0LcQYdGXCL2ib0vj nBxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVv5Chz+bLzIm6lqjPm39YG6XOvQ6So6+YjcI5iISd8ShE17ORq nNe0MjvvRr/3goEcUiiaoCb2fMqHrHM= X-Received: by 2002:a19:c210:: with SMTP id l16mr21640528lfc.35.1577213390894; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:49:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from pc636 ([37.212.210.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z7sm12351936lfa.81.2019.12.24.10.49.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:49:50 -0800 (PST) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 19:49:40 +0100 To: Joel Fernandes Cc: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" , LKML , "Paul E . McKenney" , RCU , Steven Rostedt , Oleksiy Avramchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu/tree: support kfree_bulk() interface in kfree_rcu() Message-ID: <20191224184940.GA16346@pc636> References: <20191220125624.3953-1-urezki@gmail.com> <20191221232117.GA67625@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191221232117.GA67625@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Joel. > > Hi Uladzislau, > > Your patch is based on an older version of the kfree_rcu work. The latest > version is in Paul's -dev branch. There is also additional work done in that > branch as well "rcu: Add multiple in-flight batches of kfree_rcu() work" : > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git/commit/?h=dev&id=e38fa01b94c87dfa945afa603ed50b4f7955934b > Ahh. I see there are some differences and my baseline is wrong. I will double check and rebase on Paul's -dev branch. > > Could you rebase your patch on Paul's -dev branch? The branch also has an > rcuperf patch for measuring memory footprint automatically (memory footprint > value is printed by rcuperf). Although I'd say try to use the latest version > of the rcuperf patch by reverting that and applying: > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1170895/ . I can then add your > Tested-by tag to any future postings of the patch for rcuperf as well! > I will do that and run all tests based on the latest code base. Thanks for your comments. -- Vlad Rezki