Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp8475377ybl; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 23:20:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxXeDFFJKUCgMq9JR3eoACqRoufcMxbeVRqLlAseUR2pUe7KgupP/bZaBhcq/TKS+PH3lFO X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:c2:: with SMTP id x2mr30933834oto.8.1577258416906; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 23:20:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1577258416; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XudWyfaj5V2ffZKNlbX6M+vuocAxbkbFPsyLBbV01M0cHbSvYY4EC6Nw1GIZoeV/41 hu/dQFQOODnKzDDnIx01FuPjxht9r5U+b7MJDabK2sus9bWWL0DYooAYbGEbfJMWgQZF 0r+OVBtozflZwkEXb2ssQCzeit9nKtwJ0+fb+VA+a1l2YSOnD2/EkFoxN6e6AdJzK/fv Ky9GpGbwYVX/6Xdo31ahab5CAiIdzjYaZ+g8JR/ezYMmNFp4H5azqKQuGJ/6/MwsvtPz 3MEqDuZu2kh1SBSCPK8PB+i/WGTQ3doWC3OeBDM938nMsVGjsbeNUhz3GXNDisD1Sih/ GThg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=Y07zqddwBSYpxqT0r0DqjCrr/oZQrGIcpPa7CqkHI+0=; b=ptpUKGuoxcstGGmvgCttB5Npo0L/oDXAbeD9nCU14Ma4BUrWxOcNtaNUtwdtff4uYR 5cg7HL1OCtemb6Na3qrvHfm62rtlynMiQaK2GREqdRpVpxKroNWgubjDByzXF6CfD2Ed NFOlmMIkWqv8PB+wZZtrz7U1VzfLdjk5Zb2EurRptoGuABDLLuMKcWGVzSMk9c2fmQ8u sCVeWmP2KLgB8QEqsWWDVQ4GCmZVFYq8odDjKeBRGkg8E1obksIVv0KAonFV+tQ07COG r1NKHaWiZlIRhn/0KZQdycKohytXTmRB6JDJ/mIpTepXR5FpwdKICqqV89fn461WU60r 3+GQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l189si9761113oih.166.2019.12.24.23.19.53; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 23:20:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726369AbfLYHSk (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 Dec 2019 02:18:40 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:59306 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725865AbfLYHSk (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Dec 2019 02:18:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f00:1c3::3d5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D481A154E95E1; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 23:18:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 23:18:35 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20191224.231835.1355628010065210167.davem@davemloft.net> To: mkubecek@suse.cz Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, jiri@resnulli.us, andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 00/14] ethtool netlink interface, part 1 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Tue, 24 Dec 2019 23:18:39 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Michal Kubecek Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 00:45:14 +0100 (CET) > This is first part of netlink based alternative userspace interface for > ethtool. It aims to address some long known issues with the ioctl > interface, mainly lack of extensibility, raciness, limited error reporting > and absence of notifications. The goal is to allow userspace ethtool > utility to provide all features it currently does but without using the > ioctl interface. However, some features provided by ethtool ioctl API will > be available through other netlink interfaces (rtnetlink, devlink) if it's > more appropriate. ... Please address the feedback for patch #3 (especially the u32-->u8 thing) and then this series should be good to go! Thanks!