Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp8518900ybl; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 00:22:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwLBvxKz6co838MOBDzT6jbo4UBe2scycTanyVz8o/obakLzNE4Zojyqf9/kHsOEASX7/kq X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1401:: with SMTP id v1mr13316416otp.360.1577262159095; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 00:22:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1577262159; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lkik/soQOHzleWPBxXYlXTexoXBaQFpqUhLf+gAEzmDoC7D1WwFr5VTY9DEWb07cBg eLU3iw+BoqwevHGcuMz9cmi8mtdPk6ndGaz+qJPNuHczSI4QHD4+9WJJiYh2KtMtFbaf dvuvwQmqLkVWoxU/rDs/Xlp/6ghRmwZOIn+GN1Ofi+UbApNJw8PkJ249jzulEnjixAJ1 4zU8mPhR+ksWngqbYE9H8QuEvvO73XqxG0rdyNOq7mufYofTUhAI5EWAQEizILzLRT9F WrwM5oYlA737TArJ1CYy6E2A9LQzP8MVKsDRrY3p9DdrOd8rErK3s4QF92x1ZOfH/1DA vqIQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:message-id:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=K83HIkx3t93SDXJyO1FB5pObJwAm8xvbYEkqpHJP7VU=; b=ZzhKFAuGqheYDGCRduF6jE/MvXnhkL3UDv5Li3+YxwymJ+3/cPsV7rcgJInocPgbfo bCQtDe+8taggiSPQCHYocw2nF3iTLB3me4oqsirazCp/79NZzCB+DcdGMmv2iDQO7GBJ yeOnXztcGlFdrRMwzS0jQ/5PnZnvyoRVIc16vV5pGnaV9pNDYObFjU/CVP/A/ql5/C33 zVfU/j1qC/68scDk4MCiXPhRc8xj1MkvD7UW0JEV2vgT9jv0D/a+2FBfriXWzofavyGB saXq5CNTnRV+G32BoPE0E0mhYVeB0Guvs6l3/eduCS5b3z250myKDSjQp2cfwHAyB1IA heMg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=KzZ1lYnZ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u21si13397896otq.137.2019.12.25.00.22.26; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 00:22:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=KzZ1lYnZ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726399AbfLYIVf (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 Dec 2019 03:21:35 -0500 Received: from mail26.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.26]:48433 "EHLO mail26.static.mailgun.info" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726106AbfLYIVe (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Dec 2019 03:21:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1577262094; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=K83HIkx3t93SDXJyO1FB5pObJwAm8xvbYEkqpHJP7VU=; b=KzZ1lYnZXABHLGW+LfuREx5Q16m+AVFcQym3kHGtrFukm2NIyIdHDvsTkgvHwq+umDbjUtJt YKTCwk9IY2q6MCa7wIh35785HevKtGTKbZb0094ahaSaiwfiXABY2ZaznlaChc0btMzpJ8pg z33Xn1WiJ388lALCQ9Wu+cln1hg= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.26 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 5e031c07.7f0166a369d0-smtp-out-n02; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 08:21:27 -0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E6CBEC447A5; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 08:21:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cang) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09744C433CB; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 08:21:25 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 16:21:25 +0800 From: Can Guo To: Stanley Chu Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, pedrom.sousa@synopsys.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, beanhuo@micron.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com, peter.wang@mediatek.com, chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com, andy.teng@mediatek.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: unify scsi_block_requests usage In-Reply-To: <1577192466-20762-2-git-send-email-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> References: <1577192466-20762-1-git-send-email-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> <1577192466-20762-2-git-send-email-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: cang@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019-12-24 21:01, Stanley Chu wrote: > Currently UFS driver has ufshcd_scsi_block_requests() with > reference counter mechanism to avoid possible racing of blocking and > unblocking requests flow. Unify all users in UFS driver to use the > same function. > > Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > index ed02a70..b6b9665 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > @@ -5177,7 +5177,7 @@ static void > ufshcd_exception_event_handler(struct work_struct *work) > hba = container_of(work, struct ufs_hba, eeh_work); > > pm_runtime_get_sync(hba->dev); > - scsi_block_requests(hba->host); > + ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba); > err = ufshcd_get_ee_status(hba, &status); > if (err) { > dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed to get exception status %d\n", > @@ -5191,7 +5191,7 @@ static void > ufshcd_exception_event_handler(struct work_struct *work) > ufshcd_bkops_exception_event_handler(hba); > > out: > - scsi_unblock_requests(hba->host); > + ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba); > pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev); > return; > } Reviewed-by: Can Guo