Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp9339031ybl; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 19:43:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzYJj2CzUQADZVBlYntNU10iZF+N83XwfDTYuZxK/T0DVHiTcGshNzZCI3lnAjK1TWenbVn X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1ecf:: with SMTP id c15mr4810607otj.65.1577331784033; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 19:43:04 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1577331784; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Xzz3M1PYKOXG9k/jJJeTENJmChkqkb6vMdp9DteP/T9Ii3/jL6UBWgHg+ta+QYR4IO hWYw39rt47HF4L4qweoQhv9RzWhRLRQ4jxuPUL/37LW5qdv2g59INnxzx+PvZqngwaif Sfwx52e3eaMdkKVCrOHX7GK8uohViZRjKFL6SL585vgDJRhvhl4R+QI4A/ExHnihO+wj UMC1U5oPYgpf7tx2KPVd+4BYy+LIpwj8gwsMcjukdaNU0nogHjxdMOopPgQJwuX4ulXR 6AEp9WVCf1wiBoph0nN/j5uoV+R7LJZKbA7ymKYuIU3T43yzFnEAAGSIpS+6rLRRTrM/ CNhQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=Mb5uhjn9firG3m8nUpFk0q91xsfVDR8ahaCvEvX1s3w=; b=T0VaoynO5tOQ56u0Par/W6/5TSx7OU5gN/CnTxRPrQKkYpV0EMvdnl6Ny/eryfgg6J z9H9sqjdvnQtAsAgEGOZTieyWiOonUIPdaNrmQB3bCQXYvW8UfJeA1VcW2TaK2OW9CiH j7oxIPsOb0xHzHxev54phytddND5T/vwGlCPsjVaXG1OI3qvnMNLjMVfiBHSBi54UmAT OG8slJcX+AfiO8/br5hFcSLmhm4SNEUl9/9+NiX7UiACAfgzSY6mll/apJHyNUOGgHE4 h5WAsJe2ahNNWuJ+xrDI5+b977EhMaqX4aKiQAidOsTBaO8PC5aIDH7VpHykssXNj7EH avwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r22si15047411otn.192.2019.12.25.19.42.52; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 19:43:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726942AbfLZDmN (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 Dec 2019 22:42:13 -0500 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:8184 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726896AbfLZDmN (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Dec 2019 22:42:13 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 44DEA9AECB4CD7818790; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 11:42:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 11:42:08 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: introduce DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT_JIFFIES To: Geert Uytterhoeven CC: Jaegeuk Kim , , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Chao Yu , Linux FS Devel References: <20191223040020.109570-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <2d2b3477-3eb4-7dd3-09b1-8c686e519c0e@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 11:42:07 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/12/23 16:41, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi, > > CC linux-fsdevel > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 5:01 AM Chao Yu wrote: >> As Geert Uytterhoeven reported: >> >> for parameter HZ/50 in congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50); >> >> On some platforms, HZ can be less than 50, then unexpected 0 timeout >> jiffies will be set in congestion_wait(). >> >> This patch introduces a macro DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT_JIFFIES to limit >> mininum value of timeout jiffies. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > > Thanks for your patch! > >> --- >> fs/f2fs/compress.c | 3 ++- >> fs/f2fs/data.c | 5 +++-- >> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 ++ >> fs/f2fs/gc.c | 3 ++- >> fs/f2fs/inode.c | 3 ++- >> fs/f2fs/node.c | 3 ++- >> fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 6 ++++-- >> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 12 ++++++++---- >> fs/f2fs/super.c | 6 ++++-- >> 9 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c >> index 1bc86a54ad71..ee4fe8e644aa 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c >> @@ -945,7 +945,8 @@ static int f2fs_write_raw_pages(struct compress_ctx *cc, >> } else if (ret == -EAGAIN) { >> ret = 0; >> cond_resched(); >> - congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50); >> + congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, >> + DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT_JIFFIES); >> lock_page(cc->rpages[i]); >> clear_page_dirty_for_io(cc->rpages[i]); >> goto retry_write; >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c >> index f1f5c701228d..78b5c0b0287e 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c >> @@ -2320,7 +2320,8 @@ int f2fs_encrypt_one_page(struct f2fs_io_info *fio) >> /* flush pending IOs and wait for a while in the ENOMEM case */ >> if (PTR_ERR(fio->encrypted_page) == -ENOMEM) { >> f2fs_flush_merged_writes(fio->sbi); >> - congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50); >> + congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, >> + DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT_JIFFIES); >> gfp_flags |= __GFP_NOFAIL; >> goto retry_encrypt; >> } >> @@ -2900,7 +2901,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping, >> if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL) { >> cond_resched(); >> congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, >> - HZ/50); >> + DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT_JIFFIES); >> goto retry_write; >> } >> goto next; >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >> index 16edbf4e05e8..4bdc20a94185 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >> @@ -559,6 +559,8 @@ enum { >> >> #define DEFAULT_RETRY_IO_COUNT 8 /* maximum retry read IO count */ >> >> +#define DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT_JIFFIES (max_t(long, HZ/50, 1)) >> + >> /* maximum retry quota flush count */ >> #define DEFAULT_RETRY_QUOTA_FLUSH_COUNT 8 >> > > Seeing other file systems (ext4, xfs) and even core MM code suffers from > the same issue, perhaps it makes sense to move this into congestion_wait(), > i.e. increase the timeout to 1 if it's zero in the latter function? Yup, maybe I can submit a RFC patch to change congestion_wait(), before that we still need this f2fs change. Thanks, > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert >