Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp10122751ybl; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 11:13:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzhkXYQZqx+kCLlRDAvd09Wf812LY9fIHJ47yh2d48qlbAo7GPjPOiOL1ujs6thmXw0xUyf X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:158:: with SMTP id j24mr53430966otp.316.1577387627796; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 11:13:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1577387627; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ICHm56KG3b/Gh/pbsdp6W4lsRcK9Yvjg67Xoc5fnB6tD1epXxaFJW5ZCx/813wLb3Z vP2g3riDbZ8o57x21+mXP+eZYyHamjZU6lWToEX6h/Cf/NQ56Ua+mrhJ47Tsp+XZ15cC FXNN2LzeNFK12kcGmBmZNJ3hj4gY0bFeE1OoBQIstH0/pRvEdtAGmrzmv+6Q8L+vBijD cVNUbJR6IsgvQjCmZQUD4e95EKAc7zTS4zMYzpkCfCnKSRroHpGPb/pE2rSYblX+gLaR DJMdDDOlOH1ZJhmz8VWh9GObZNi7qnNm5r7q/LYjIEf25IYjKyrMcuXylZ4GFfTjFKT5 MDdA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=r8KpMgsYL2ZCy9eGVPdtnJ4T4Q2FxqQwB9hJfGokaLs=; b=jiHb1YolRkriK8y83H5g6sDdv29MOFrZYXUmuQ8IsaRzHL26nexiIqen4Zu2hvqvkQ JlNtyW3VMEkPPL4vrzd6OjXbYXbn1fpxaOR9LqNWeFsrwIXvGbaK9cKKlaX+5wcq2L9D PtqU+E8znxmwfOhmmtkalDH2N2YOCS1jQT0s+NuOfBd6rSnnIFu+ohhi6MfcAr6qcl7U SkvWAHoHoEOzsKN0fHfzMyAJ3iFxxJ0qQFyZWXd9U/dMsuHETjW5R7zXryzbY4VztgXX 18YMhcmN102I58yUpe0d7safprD2ZotNF+ZXTZs77kLQV1B6liZAxmUiyMINTzcunRiX ThUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=b1Bea9Qq; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c10si7654294otr.88.2019.12.26.11.13.32; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 11:13:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=b1Bea9Qq; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726752AbfLZTMY (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Dec 2019 14:12:24 -0500 Received: from mail-vk1-f194.google.com ([209.85.221.194]:42277 "EHLO mail-vk1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726511AbfLZTMY (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Dec 2019 14:12:24 -0500 Received: by mail-vk1-f194.google.com with SMTP id s142so6316152vkd.9 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 11:12:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=r8KpMgsYL2ZCy9eGVPdtnJ4T4Q2FxqQwB9hJfGokaLs=; b=b1Bea9QqFDzeF9WPB0W5ucaCk4UmLbyLzI58h7lEJOhZk39mF9M9biGSVuCZ4X3tbW JFuIFnUCXw8ixNcsTDJKGKvoG6g/R3HcNNZLXRbmyn71/cBPL7G5KO6RTRqjdB8SjpLd 2hW3ccGuDSz2WNYtxyjIMQfkq8PD8hX6GxO4TBfe3WGEd5d1fML3yt6bfHazSEj9FhrS D72tB5v6lPkD32ey6Gw1MWRlAwPDuf3Vh23Iq2u2Ixwx8iFi2em/zQ/U7xOnvKDZ5kfI iU+B6eBazSGV4hwoNxAj02v2c53fp0KSOUduOSzuGGU0BjYMe9UwdG/d0MuR7jKaEfcG Caag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=r8KpMgsYL2ZCy9eGVPdtnJ4T4Q2FxqQwB9hJfGokaLs=; b=HnAi+0i98c9bkgTDKpQEzvejkloU7gZ+/p10Bxy2w47GFYRpikKfDm+fpfndv1vTxk qgIjaYs4M3CDZuiUD8zUwPxu6I+JI+XZhJbkydYpcrrOr5OuAIYH5CZQo8ElHFhQh8wy 0aykrjrTu1J7pD5Ifus6WrVH4tyHmvZc8sqKJP2cET0K3NoWLvN+rhjdimgaVXgF46Ll hOKTvap6+qm1RQJLa5xbf2nKl9LKRHgKpozcC+emZpv01HpsOc7HucaglUMCg3nJZRCa BL3F1DqYmEClcLZ1dHCl5Q3wl2m5jZTHgIsKzxehYmf7bLiXzVb26kmvN6VQ+qh02ElM M00Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV9T9m2u9NnCEj7Dr+fN1LkS3TWlJs/19wNupWLHderlIwIx9y/ agPMuPV5fCJGin74SJ66a4+dX+IlkuEdtYWqUhwxKudnPoo= X-Received: by 2002:ac5:cde3:: with SMTP id v3mr28383914vkn.43.1577387541747; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 11:12:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191223140322.20013-1-mst@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Alistair Delva Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 11:12:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ To: Willem de Bruijn Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , LKML , Jason Wang , "David S. Miller" , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Network Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 8:02 AM Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 3:22 PM Alistair Delva wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 12:12 PM Willem de Bruijn > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 2:56 PM Willem de Bruijn > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > 00fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > > > > > Call Trace: > > > > > > ? preempt_count_add+0x58/0xb0 > > > > > > ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x36/0x70 > > > > > > ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1a/0x40 > > > > > > ? __wake_up+0x70/0x190 > > > > > > virtnet_set_features+0x90/0xf0 [virtio_net] > > > > > > __netdev_update_features+0x271/0x980 > > > > > > ? nlmsg_notify+0x5b/0xa0 > > > > > > dev_disable_lro+0x2b/0x190 > > > > > > ? inet_netconf_notify_devconf+0xe2/0x120 > > > > > > devinet_sysctl_forward+0x176/0x1e0 > > > > > > proc_sys_call_handler+0x1f0/0x250 > > > > > > proc_sys_write+0xf/0x20 > > > > > > __vfs_write+0x3e/0x190 > > > > > > ? __sb_start_write+0x6d/0xd0 > > > > > > vfs_write+0xd3/0x190 > > > > > > ksys_write+0x68/0xd0 > > > > > > __ia32_sys_write+0x14/0x20 > > > > > > do_fast_syscall_32+0x86/0xe0 > > > > > > entry_SYSENTER_compat+0x7c/0x8e > > > > > > > > > > > > A similar crash will likely trigger when enabling XDP. > > > > > > > > > > > > Reported-by: Alistair Delva > > > > > > Reported-by: Willem de Bruijn > > > > > > Fixes: 3f93522ffab2 ("virtio-net: switch off offloads on demand if possible on XDP set") > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > Lightly tested. > > > > > > > > > > > > Alistair, could you please test and confirm that this resolves the > > > > > > crash for you? > > > > > > > > > > This patch doesn't work. The reason is that NETIF_F_LRO is also turned > > > > > on by TSO4/TSO6, which your patch didn't check for. So it ends up > > > > > going through the same path and crashing in the same way. > > > > > > > > > > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) || > > > > > virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6)) > > > > > dev->features |= NETIF_F_LRO; > > > > > > > > > > It sounds like this patch is fixing something slightly differently to > > > > > my patch fixed. virtnet_set_features() doesn't care about > > > > > GUEST_OFFLOADS, it only tests against NETIF_F_LRO. Even if "offloads" > > > > > is zero, it will call virtnet_set_guest_offloads(), which triggers the > > > > > crash. > > > > > > > > > > > > Interesting. It's surprising that it is trying to configure a flag > > > > that is not configurable, i.e., absent from dev->hw_features > > > > after Michael's change. > > > > > > > > > So either we need to ensure NETIF_F_LRO is never set, or > > > > > > > > LRO might be available, just not configurable. Indeed this was what I > > > > observed in the past. > > > > > > dev_disable_lro expects that NETIF_F_LRO is always configurable. Which > > > I guess is a reasonable assumption, just not necessarily the case in > > > virtio_net. > > > > > > So I think we need both patches. Correctly mark the feature as fixed > > > by removing from dev->hw_features and also ignore the request from > > > dev_disable_lro, which does not check for this. > > > > Something like this maybe: > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > index 4d7d5434cc5d..0556f42b0fb5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > @@ -2560,6 +2560,9 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev, > > u64 offloads; > > int err; > > > > + if (!virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS)) > > + return 0; > > + > > if ((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_LRO) { > > if (vi->xdp_queue_pairs) > > return -EBUSY; > > @@ -2971,6 +2974,15 @@ static int virtnet_validate(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > if (!virtnet_validate_features(vdev)) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > + /* VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS does not work without > > + * VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ. However the virtio spec does not > > + * specify that VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends > > + * on VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ so devices can set the later but > > + * not the former. > > + */ > > + if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ)) > > + __virtio_clear_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS); > > + > > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU)) { > > int mtu = virtio_cread16(vdev, > > offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, > > I think we need three separate patches. > > - disable guest offloads if VQ is absent > - remove LRO from hw_features if guest offloads are absent > > This should fix the ethtool path. But there is a separate path to > disable LRO through dev_disable_lro (from bond enslave, xdp install, > sysctl -n net.ipv.ip_forward=1, ..) that assumes LRO is always > configurable. So we cannot work around needing a patch to > virtset_set_features. > > After a long detour, I think your original submission is fine for > that. Alright. Knowing all the use cases now, and if nobody beats me to it, I'll resubmit this as a series which fixes the three paths. > Perhaps with a comment in the commit that it is needed even > if the feature is absent from hw_features for dev_disable_lro. Ack.