Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp11000109ybl; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 06:04:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyJyyp5iyAPSPSsvb3aDnJqjXeZ4uck1RPHjtNDgTPT78L2ZHVQz3CEYK+KUMO77+guQQz4 X-Received: by 2002:aca:f354:: with SMTP id r81mr3188026oih.90.1577455480656; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 06:04:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1577455480; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SE6n1OtYddwrgPsre6algItbFWvQL0yakoOrhoiek3F8PP1UGxay6qmAzU55Vyhhc6 s2RbCG9gKuioLryg5t2wA0mFtoZLmg2r5QjGy6FvYxiuI9rp8HVvouFT3At18a6R18GA 1cGBO48i4MCc7AR1eU5hYIfgKm1vPQr9fbvWaWnpbE9BO+zb6r/FPIFgxs1AfHgMn6Ns owaNhjw+Y4l/eye5hP5vmayOg3adZbMAgwsJKvJiCjTFXE7DsZnMFwTENGz5S3P3j4Pm N/q7l0TaVzbB4I0fO6TzZFtGKgE9KJa06Vo+Dw+QWGjSd88k0cXhMTLy//yH3sCZtSH7 V6YQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=4kk4kjTYB3vMicyUTb6FhsoL/vhFlwP4Xv/udauedMI=; b=HCG2iIijf8mTMj/+gQt45+Sx0iCnLXbegmcubG75oYJLqLOHZIIpjM2rjS8VFCFMx0 Fvo4U0yh8PVnTj9JqpzR3bVd5QyX5fzoYGf52OPiw05vpsUB96hgtTsa9F2r8A3dD0nA LD8FPM6DjWDGD4YIlJVB4N9hxJsMzuyzQ2fZADTEa00kw1eBAs0vHoFF+QbRZ8w1Q000 YCu+x+KF8qM/xjxtKZqeGGIBWGXLPCQZQ0ZxaDJb52ziGW4ObU6/drD4oQHyjowCU6Re qcVcbs/I5Gf3U3WSj59DWPuj/mj4pLzmMlpNMDiT2Ixe2+rmIxPWK+Pw08wwveO7/rn2 g1pw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q28si15233946oij.149.2019.12.27.06.04.18; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 06:04:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726602AbfL0ODW (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Dec 2019 09:03:22 -0500 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:44482 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726053AbfL0ODW (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Dec 2019 09:03:22 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:2c:6930:5cf4:84a1:2763:fe0d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbrezillon) by bhuna.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B782B289B90; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 14:03:18 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 15:03:15 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Inki Dae , Seung-Woo Kim , Andrzej Hajda , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Laurent Pinchart , Neil Armstrong , Sam Ravnborg , Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: Fix Exynos DSI after making bridge chain a double-linked list Message-ID: <20191227150315.0ab22599@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: <20191227142313.5032ff0f@collabora.com> References: <20191227110135.4961-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20191227130004.69d7dcad@collabora.com> <20191227142313.5032ff0f@collabora.com> Organization: Collabora X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 14:23:13 +0100 Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:00:04 +0100 > Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 12:01:35 +0100 > > Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > > > > Exynos DSI DRM driver uses private calls to out bridge to force certain > > > order of operations during init/exit sequences. This no longer works after > > > conversion of bridge chain to a double-linked list. To fix the regression > > > call bridge related operations manually instead of the generic > > > drm_bridge_chain_*() operations. > > > > I think it'd be worth explaining what the problem is (infinite loop > > caused by list_for_each_entry() use when the bridge is no longer part > > of the chain attached to the encoder). > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski > > > Fixes: 05193dc38197 ("drm/bridge: Make the bridge chain a double-linked list") > > > > We also need to fix that in VC4. > > > > > --- > > > This patch is a result of the following discussion: > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg239256.html > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c > > > index 3955f84dc893..f5905c239a86 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c > > > @@ -255,7 +255,6 @@ struct exynos_dsi { > > > struct mipi_dsi_host dsi_host; > > > struct drm_connector connector; > > > struct drm_panel *panel; > > > - struct list_head bridge_chain; > > > struct drm_bridge *out_bridge; > > > struct device *dev; > > > > > > @@ -1391,7 +1390,8 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) > > > if (ret < 0) > > > goto err_put_sync; > > > } else { > > > - drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable(dsi->out_bridge); > > > + if (dsi->out_bridge->funcs->pre_enable) > > > + dsi->out_bridge->funcs->pre_enable(dsi->out_bridge); > > > > Okay, so you're calling ->{pre_enable,enable,disable,post_disable}() on > > the first bridge element which only works if the chain contains one > > bridge (see below). Maybe you should keep exynos_dsi.bridge_chain and > > create custom helpers to iterate over chain elements instead of calling > > those hooks only on out_bridge. > > The following diff should fix the problem while keeping the solution > generic enough to support chains containing more than one bridge. > > --->8--- > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c > index 3955f84dc893..c861b640fc59 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c > @@ -1378,6 +1378,7 @@ static void exynos_dsi_unregister_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi) > static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) > { > struct exynos_dsi *dsi = encoder_to_dsi(encoder); > + struct drm_bridge *iter; > int ret; > > if (dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_ENABLED) > @@ -1391,7 +1392,11 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) > if (ret < 0) > goto err_put_sync; > } else { > - drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable(dsi->out_bridge); > + list_for_each_entry_reverse(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain, ^&dsi->bridge_chain And the same applies to all list_for_each() calls in this patch. > + chain_node) { > + if (iter->funcs->pre_enable) > + iter->funcs->pre_enable(iter); > + } > } > > exynos_dsi_set_display_mode(dsi); > @@ -1402,7 +1407,10 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) > if (ret < 0) > goto err_display_disable; > } else { > - drm_bridge_chain_enable(dsi->out_bridge); > + list_for_each_entry(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain, chain_node) { > + if (iter->funcs->enable) > + iter->funcs->enable(iter); > + } > } > > dsi->state |= DSIM_STATE_VIDOUT_AVAILABLE; > @@ -1420,6 +1428,7 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) > static void exynos_dsi_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) > { > struct exynos_dsi *dsi = encoder_to_dsi(encoder); > + struct drm_bridge *iter; > > if (!(dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_ENABLED)) > return; > @@ -1427,10 +1436,20 @@ static void exynos_dsi_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) > dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_VIDOUT_AVAILABLE; > > drm_panel_disable(dsi->panel); > - drm_bridge_chain_disable(dsi->out_bridge); > + > + list_for_each_entry_reverse(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain, chain_node) { > + if (iter->funcs->disable) > + iter->funcs->disable(iter); > + } > + > exynos_dsi_set_display_enable(dsi, false); > drm_panel_unprepare(dsi->panel); > - drm_bridge_chain_post_disable(dsi->out_bridge); > + > + list_for_each_entry(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain, chain_node) { > + if (iter->funcs->post_disable) > + iter->funcs->post_disable(iter); > + } > + > dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_ENABLED; > pm_runtime_put_sync(dsi->dev); > } > @@ -1523,7 +1542,7 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, > if (out_bridge) { > drm_bridge_attach(encoder, out_bridge, NULL); > dsi->out_bridge = out_bridge; > - list_splice(&encoder->bridge_chain, &dsi->bridge_chain); > + list_splice_init(&encoder->bridge_chain, &dsi->bridge_chain); > } else { > int ret = exynos_dsi_create_connector(encoder); >