Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750970AbWAYQ5F (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:57:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750955AbWAYQ5F (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:57:05 -0500 Received: from smtpout.mac.com ([17.250.248.97]:58578 "EHLO smtpout.mac.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750970AbWAYQ5E (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:57:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43D7A7F4.nailDE92K7TJI@burner> References: <787b0d920601241858w375a42efnc780f74b5c05e5d0@mail.gmail.com> <43D7A7F4.nailDE92K7TJI@burner> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <8614E822-9ED1-4CB1-B8F0-7571D1A7767E@mac.com> Cc: rlrevell@joe-job.com, matthias.andree@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acahalan@gmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kyle Moffett Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:56:37 -0500 To: Joerg Schilling X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1915 Lines: 61 On Jan 25, 2006, at 11:31, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Albert Cahalan wrote: >> We Linux users will forever patch your software to work the > > Looks like you are not a native English speaker. "We" is incorrect > here, as you only speak for yourself. I agree completely with his statements, therefore he speaks for at least two people and "we" is proper usage. I suspect given the posts on this list the last time this flamewar came up that there are more as well, but 2 is enough. > libscg includes... Irrelevant to the discussion at hand, we are talking only about linux and what should be done on linux. > - Only 5 of them allow a /dev/hd* device name related access. No, you have this wrong: - One of them (IE: Linux) requires a /dev/[hs]d* device-name related access - Only 4 others allow /dev/hd* However, the later is _completely_ _irrelevant_ to the discussion, as we are talking about Linux *only*. > [irrelevant discussion of other platforms] > 17 Platforms _need_ the addressing scheme libscg offers > 5 Platforms _may_ use a different access method too. Wrong again: 17 platforms need libscg's addressing 4 platforms offer /dev/* access 1 platform (Linux) _requires_ /dev/* access You are perfectly free to adjust your compatibility layer accordingly. > BTW: the wording of your posting [...] Personal attacks are offtopic, irrelevant, and rude. Please refrain from doing so. If you don't plan to respond to somebody's email, just don't, no reason to shout about it to a world who doesn't care. Cheers, Kyle Moffett -- Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming -- C.A.R. Hoare - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/