Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From:   Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_owner: print largest memory consumer when OOM panic occurs
Date:   Sun, 29 Dec 2019 20:51:08 -0500
Message-Id: <D8935037-8A59-4A64-9C35-52486DC01015@lca.pw>
References: <1577669436.25204.8.camel@mtkswgap22>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        wsd_upstream@mediatek.com
In-Reply-To: <1577669436.25204.8.camel@mtkswgap22>
To:     Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


> On Dec 29, 2019, at 8:30 PM, Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, printing top 10 will be too much. That's why I print only the
> greatest consumer, and test if this approach works.
> 
> I will resend this patch after the break. Let's wait for others'
> comments?

Sure, but to make my point clear.

Nacked-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>