Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 30 Dec 2019 12:08:49 -0600
From:   Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/434] 5.4.7-stable review
Message-ID: <20191230180849.222x3hg2tnpwz7dn@xps.therub.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
References: <20191229172702.393141737@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20191230163437.sz4mb5gh7ed2htfa@xps.therub.org>
 <20191230174522.GA1499079@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20191230174522.GA1499079@kroah.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 06:45:22PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 10:34:37AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 06:20:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.7 release.
> > > There are 434 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > 
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
> 
> But didn't you add perf build testing to your builds?  That should have
> broken things, so I am guessing not :(

We do build (and run) perf, and it worked for us. Which patch was the
problem? I can go look at why our config didn't hit the offending
code/build path.

Dan

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org