Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:05:19 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/219] 4.19.92-stable review
Message-ID: <20191231160519.GB11542@roeck-us.net>
References: <20191229162508.458551679@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191229162508.458551679@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 06:16:42PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.92 release.
> There are 219 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:17:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

For -rc2:

Build results:
	total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 381 pass: 376 fail: 5
Failed tests:
	ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:initrd
	ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:ide:rootfs
	ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:sdhci:mmc:rootfs
	ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:nvme:rootfs
	ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:scsi[DC395]:rootfs

Bug-for-bug compatible with mainline. That makes me wonder if I should
stop testing those ppc images instead of being annoyed by the failures.
Thoughts ?

Guenter