Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751315AbWAZFQS (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:16:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751314AbWAZFQS (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:16:18 -0500 Received: from mail.shareable.org ([81.29.64.88]:64148 "EHLO mail.shareable.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750796AbWAZFQR (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:16:17 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:01:47 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: Lee Revell Cc: Bernd Petrovitsch , Horst von Brand , "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" , Diego Calleja , Ram Gupta , mloftis@wgops.com, barryn@pobox.com, a1426z@gawab.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] VM: I have a dream... Message-ID: <20060126050147.GB23296@mail.shareable.org> References: <200601240211.k0O28rnn003165@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <1138181033.4800.4.camel@tara.firmix.at> <20060125150516.GB8490@mail.shareable.org> <1138231714.3087.66.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1138231714.3087.66.camel@mindpipe> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1376 Lines: 32 Lee Revell wrote: > > Mozilla / Firefox / Opera in particular. 300MB is not funny on a > > laptop which cannot be expanded beyond 192MB. Are there any usable > > graphical _small_ web browsers around? Usable meaning actually works > > on real web sites with fancy features. > > "Small" and "fancy features" are not compatible. > > That's the problem with the term "usable" - to developers it means > "supports the basic core functionality of a web browser" while to users > it means "supports every bell and whistle that I get on Windows". As both a developer and user, all I want is a web browser that works with the sites I visit, and performs reasonably well on my laptop. I know there are fast algorithms for layout, for running scripts and updating trees, and the memory usage doesn't have to be anywhere near as much as it is. So it's reasonable to ask if anyone has written a fast browser that works with current popular sites in fits in under 256MB after a few days use. Unfortunately, the response seems to be no, nobody has. I guess it's a big job and there isn't the interest and resourcing to do it. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/