Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200102125830.z2uz673dlsdttjvo@pali>
References: <20200102082036.29643-1-namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
 <CGME20200102082408epcas1p194621a6aa6729011703f0c5a076a7396@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
 <20200102082036.29643-13-namjae.jeon@samsung.com> <20200102125830.z2uz673dlsdttjvo@pali>
From:   Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Jan 2020 22:07:16 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd9Y6o+a7q_yismLP8nNXOUqrudC3KW8N6Z05OghYLt1jg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/13] exfat: add exfat in fs/Kconfig and fs/Makefile
To:     =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=C3=A1r?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc:     Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu, hch@lst.de,
        sj1557.seo@samsung.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

>> index 98be354fdb61..2c7ea7e0a95b 100644
>> --- a/fs/Makefile
>> +++ b/fs/Makefile
>> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS)		+=3D hugetlbfs/
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_CODA_FS)		+=3D coda/
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_MINIX_FS)		+=3D minix/
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_FAT_FS)		+=3D fat/
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXFAT)		+=3D exfat/
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_BFS_FS)		+=3D bfs/
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ISO9660_FS)	+=3D isofs/
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS)	+=3D hfsplus/ # Before hfs to find wrapped HFS=
+
>
> Seems that all filesystems have _FS suffix in their config names. So
> should not have exfat config also same convention? CONFIG_EXFAT_FS?
Yeah, I know, However, That name conflicts with staging/exfat.
So I subtracted _FS suffix.
>
> --
> Pali Roh=C3=A1r
> pali.rohar@gmail.com
>