Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp17482987ybl; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 06:20:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzPyLo87P7AXDaJLDCGheWjqHIqMmGN0orzjROmUzeUo0S2/fRuWdhVJZXraFbvKWsSzVwh X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2965:: with SMTP id d92mr86830106otb.175.1577974823279; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 06:20:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1577974823; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YBDA5x8V+efMTCPyAPFl+I3o++aEQbKv/5E572Ioh1eMmMAaajWcudQuokRrFaYe3m U+Hi0kfEspBWfC5LrzhWs99OAK77wo1sWTLSuMRb5UMJJtrTeUhaPmd+riSbxgjzBmat iZKAEz5jPcFCon4nNow5p0/IDLm2A3/qItzva103XYucA0Eks62TOw6dZ/qSvJhiIOO2 5aTG6ED+hP+LTZnt2F8fnr+T38IMb0ISn7o1H6++CA9nr6OHa0pZYhlTneFLyI1csJ4P ZJ1kqLAQRtkQnpVnaBgNYdVDBQJxs8NiMtJo6w3EjQrVhLG29AIsFAO5FnDJ4FblyB1B f5ng== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=uRq/3QYkkp/H+NInrJK0ytU+Y3oPfS6pV0jeocYMFD4=; b=giKd/+0qqYc+pXGwa3yEsFDyvUMA195wI7Mw/BzLykMh6fPqPS1W2dTX7ZHJfrd/br fmtDNoMdHqBLx4V/FfGmkcTuvHL8JA8jhis9DZtN+kftPEKXyCunVHnVYeS4cDQ2y2O+ MJNKVakFpvLFIzLrPuSsm8bhMSefhGOfQIgLu0PKdYtlgx8q7Veq8BwuCzaS/NL3vJrc z0j1nQgL3GvXh36if2x09MIFETpf7+C2IkqsUtP/yAlWLiWBSh/yi8qNyMV8wkhu70kx pM3PmZ/9OwedQcqCp0i2eK+N7zoS4E/H0ILfMpW2tVnq6AoitKSZADJ+tF6Ue4Z9lTiV fbGw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=s7A4dqgO; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f17si25050128otl.181.2020.01.02.06.20.10; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 06:20:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=s7A4dqgO; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728507AbgABOTT (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 Jan 2020 09:19:19 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56166 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728288AbgABOTS (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2020 09:19:18 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B840520848; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 14:19:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1577974758; bh=azw6s+4YpK/zg0zwfD1zIRd9wypiLG8FH6IqHaoMSdY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=s7A4dqgONgna/uhxg1dWe7oStJT/A7WggEj56SZbprqOf5F1CTit165Ag6P+oZiNx E4gFXxnyMejVLppWzuIZ1eonVB7NjZFbPkCTmxisMVkCi5e4V20TLgmtaOVQmmgYCC st7q6gqK0zbcW17JMAGzqeFMYdtbDEmoin7tv6mM= Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 15:19:10 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Namjae Jeon Cc: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , Namjae Jeon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu, hch@lst.de, sj1557.seo@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/13] exfat: add exfat in fs/Kconfig and fs/Makefile Message-ID: <20200102141910.GA4020603@kroah.com> References: <20200102082036.29643-1-namjae.jeon@samsung.com> <20200102082036.29643-13-namjae.jeon@samsung.com> <20200102125830.z2uz673dlsdttjvo@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:07:16PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote: > >> index 98be354fdb61..2c7ea7e0a95b 100644 > >> --- a/fs/Makefile > >> +++ b/fs/Makefile > >> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS) += hugetlbfs/ > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CODA_FS) += coda/ > >> obj-$(CONFIG_MINIX_FS) += minix/ > >> obj-$(CONFIG_FAT_FS) += fat/ > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXFAT) += exfat/ > >> obj-$(CONFIG_BFS_FS) += bfs/ > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ISO9660_FS) += isofs/ > >> obj-$(CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS) += hfsplus/ # Before hfs to find wrapped HFS+ > > > > Seems that all filesystems have _FS suffix in their config names. So > > should not have exfat config also same convention? CONFIG_EXFAT_FS? > Yeah, I know, However, That name conflicts with staging/exfat. > So I subtracted _FS suffix. If it's a problem, please send me a patch to rename the staging/exfat/ config option so that you can use the "real" one someday soon. thanks, greg k-h