Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932130AbWAZJh5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:37:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932138AbWAZJh5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:37:57 -0500 Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de ([193.174.154.14]:49857 "EHLO mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932130AbWAZJh5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:37:57 -0500 From: Joerg Schilling Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:35:48 +0100 To: schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de, matthias.andree@gmx.de Cc: rlrevell@joe-job.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de, axboe@suse.de Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Message-ID: <43D897F4.nailDTH1UTLO4@burner> References: <20060123180106.GA4879@merlin.emma.line.org> <1138039993.2977.62.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060123185549.GA15985@merlin.emma.line.org> <43D530CC.nailC4Y11KE7A@burner> <1138048255.21481.15.camel@mindpipe> <20060123212119.GI1820@merlin.emma.line.org> <43D78585.nailD7855YVBX@burner> <20060125142155.GW4212@suse.de> <20060125145544.GA4212@suse.de> <43D7AEBF.nailDFJ7263OE@burner> <43D7B100.7040706@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <43D7B100.7040706@gmx.de> User-Agent: nail 11.2 8/15/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2039 Lines: 45 Matthias Andree wrote: > I think we'd better call the whole discussion off. Let me come back to this again and give an important statement... If this mailing list is not the place where to make architectural design decisions, then we really better should stop this discussion immediately as it then would be useless. Please inform me about this fact in case you know more as I really don't have time to waste with useless discussions. It seems also required to give some background information: Without Matthias, I would already never again answered any mail from LKML as all previous experiences on this list have been a desaster. It did usually take less than an hour until someone from the list did start personal attacks. The last two times, the discussion has been made impossible because Jens Axboe started with personal infringements and his obvious false claims. This time, it did look really promising until Jens Axboe again started with personal infringements. I have to admit that it would have been better to ignore him from the very beginning, but I was in false hope that he could have changed. Let me make a proposal: I try to answer mail from people who send useful contributions to the discussion and I will ignore anybody who starts with personal infringements. I will try to reply to mails with incorrect claims if they are not obvious but I will stop replying to the same person if he continues with things that are incorrect. J?rg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/