Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932274AbWAZKKi (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:10:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932273AbWAZKKi (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:10:38 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21]:14533 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932274AbWAZKKh (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:10:37 -0500 X-Authenticated: #428038 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:10:26 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: Joerg Schilling , matthias.andree@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Message-ID: <20060126101026.GA27752@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joerg Schilling , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de References: <20060123212119.GI1820@merlin.emma.line.org> <43D78585.nailD7855YVBX@burner> <20060125142155.GW4212@suse.de> <20060125145544.GA4212@suse.de> <43D7AEBF.nailDFJ7263OE@burner> <43D7B100.7040706@gmx.de> <43D897F4.nailDTH1UTLO4@burner> <20060126094839.GQ4212@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20060126094839.GQ4212@suse.de> X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1122 Lines: 27 Jens Axboe schrieb am 2006-01-26: > What is this, kindergarten? What false claims have I made? I pointed out > several you made, to which you had no rebuttal. Then you start playing > "Jens made obviously false claims", huh?? I've had more mature > conversations with my 1 year old son. > > I'm sorry if you feel that me refuting your false statements are > personal attacks. Clearly not a problem that can be fixed at my end. > Ignoring facts and continuing to write the same wrong claims over and > over again doesn't make them true in the end. The problem appears to be that J?rg hasn't really looked at Linux in some time, and he's used to systems that don't change architecture in patchlevel releases, while Linux 2.6.N.M should actually have been numbered 2.(6+2*N).M... J?rg, any chance you might be arguing on basis of really old 2.6.X kernels? -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/