Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
To:     "'Greg KH'" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     =?iso-8859-1?Q?'Pali_Roh=E1r'?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>, <hch@lst.de>, <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
        "'Namjae Jeon'" <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200102141910.GA4020603@kroah.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 12/13] exfat: add exfat in fs/Kconfig and fs/Makefile
Date:   Fri, 3 Jan 2020 08:48:34 +0900
Message-ID: <001401d5c1c7$2531c8d0$6f955a70$@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: ko
Thread-Index: AQJSGi/S1M7UFBjz5N3SW71o+eawLwJukssYAlUK9DECBK+/DwIuybYIAbHfR8GmihFUEA==
CMS-TYPE: 101P
DLP-Filter: Pass
References: <20200102082036.29643-1-namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
        <CGME20200102082408epcas1p194621a6aa6729011703f0c5a076a7396@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
        <20200102082036.29643-13-namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
        <20200102125830.z2uz673dlsdttjvo@pali>
        <CAKYAXd9Y6o+a7q_yismLP8nNXOUqrudC3KW8N6Z05OghYLt1jg@mail.gmail.com>
        <20200102141910.GA4020603@kroah.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:07:16PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> > >> index 98be354fdb61..2c7ea7e0a95b 100644
> > >> --- a/fs/Makefile
> > >> +++ b/fs/Makefile
> > >> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS)		+=
hugetlbfs/
> > >>  obj-$(CONFIG_CODA_FS)		+= coda/
> > >>  obj-$(CONFIG_MINIX_FS)		+= minix/
> > >>  obj-$(CONFIG_FAT_FS)		+= fat/
> > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXFAT)		+= exfat/
> > >>  obj-$(CONFIG_BFS_FS)		+= bfs/
> > >>  obj-$(CONFIG_ISO9660_FS)	+= isofs/
> > >>  obj-$(CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS)	+= hfsplus/ # Before hfs to find
wrapped
> HFS+
> > >
> > > Seems that all filesystems have _FS suffix in their config names. So
> > > should not have exfat config also same convention? CONFIG_EXFAT_FS?
> > Yeah, I know, However, That name conflicts with staging/exfat.
> > So I subtracted _FS suffix.
> 
> If it's a problem, please send me a patch to rename the staging/exfat/
> config option so that you can use the "real" one someday soon.
Okay, I will:)
Thanks a lot!
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h