Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp18313898ybl; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 23:19:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwDmaoxPZBUilGX+qtEAZ94mqQmO8QMfzvaVudOatf0CiGJNB/gciKxZqE9c4QdPhxmypfJ X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2965:: with SMTP id d92mr91276936otb.175.1578035985588; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 23:19:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578035985; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cAzXD+XFJhN5oEpLinmYJ9Hi9TuSUU7YDP3+ck/C0cUpWRnPR7tuJ78Fc/HhiW5uoh Aeaz8IKETlZsvYGSIVzjZRSJOvCLYyXT3OzvXt/uR/X6Thlrvq7w8J0jqNxQ4cpM5Io0 NuKcN6z8m3rtHkL+ZVDJbq7hLDLSzGziemzxwIBpyq4BEoQl2ja68kITVDS07vpT5vEg fUjYLNMQlwq68AWzWOobb/D86RCXgEdlv8GYp4gtfn94TCc4vFythf7CN6PkgmplAV8r nrK2NaroNy42OGXt9nU3u9ULrUoOx4ZKipSRzqfauYAN2phzW/BxIp2B8VIh1CfeUD3x ibuw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=z7WJo+oDVXQoi1H13BPWKzMGQ8TNFptyzbGZwYj08+U=; b=hZRIg2RrtrgAhXly+C0ydzaYQNDlHgIFeHKydPGum92Se6p79r5EwNP62xMeoRwrUA XTWW4saTtINvDD1w0OL8uQ13TGO3d08MWKz2WPaLpSio1wMG6cHmnfxbt355bZoiY4N4 mYewfBl8fjFdTK3Fs6ItvHY8EL0jMLRBULZ97oCCMh7JTR7FVbLy2J0pWeHKRoXaWUPL FuGT0N3JEIswlKt6nm7fW3iCCu09SHFbJImKgYgSQePS0N+j9NtVEl8ktFjxMVxKacLX 122tTQMj1JhTXW4xFlOsuk1gRTr9BvSyK65EiP/ykeKH5Nqss7d5h4GAI9qXXV80RUAF 9S0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a64si28646751oif.256.2020.01.02.23.19.32; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 23:19:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726180AbgACHSr (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Jan 2020 02:18:47 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:55587 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725890AbgACHSq (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jan 2020 02:18:46 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jan 2020 23:18:45 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,389,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="252507763" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Jan 2020 23:18:44 -0800 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 15:18:46 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: Wei Yang Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, willy@infradead.org Subject: Re: [Patch v2] mm/rmap.c: split huge pmd when it really is Message-ID: <20200103071846.GA16057@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20191223222856.7189-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191223222856.7189-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 06:28:56AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >When page is not NULL, function is called by try_to_unmap_one() with >TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD set. There are two cases to call try_to_unmap_one() >with TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD set: > > * unmap_page() > * shrink_page_list() > >In both case, the page passed to try_to_unmap_one() is PageHead() of the >THP. If this page's mapping address in process is not HPAGE_PMD_SIZE >aligned, this means the THP is not mapped as PMD THP in this process. >This could happen when we do mremap() a PMD size range to an un-aligned >address. > >Currently, this case is handled by following check in __split_huge_pmd() >luckily. > > page != pmd_page(*pmd) > >This patch checks the address to skip some work. I am sorry to forget address Kirill's comment in 1st version. The first one is the performance difference after this change for a PTE mappged THP. Here is the result:(in cycle) Before Patched 963 195 988 40 895 78 Average 948 104 So the change reduced 90% time for function split_huge_pmd_address(). For the 2nd comment, the vma check. Let me take a further look to analysis. Thanks for Kirill's suggestion. > >Signed-off-by: Wei Yang > >--- >v2: move the check into split_huge_pmd_address(). >--- > mm/huge_memory.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c >index 893fecd5daa4..2b9c2f412b32 100644 >--- a/mm/huge_memory.c >+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c >@@ -2342,6 +2342,22 @@ void split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, > pud_t *pud; > pmd_t *pmd; > >+ /* >+ * When page is not NULL, function is called by try_to_unmap_one() >+ * with TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD set. There are two places set >+ * TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD >+ * >+ * unmap_page() >+ * shrink_page_list() >+ * >+ * In both cases, the "page" here is the PageHead() of a THP. >+ * >+ * If the page is not a PMD mapped huge page, e.g. after mremap(), it >+ * is not necessary to split it. >+ */ >+ if (page && !IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE)) >+ return; >+ > pgd = pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, address); > if (!pgd_present(*pgd)) > return; >-- >2.17.1 -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me