Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp18727551ybl; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:58:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxnqoChR8i95Ut0VtHrT5A0W3XgImzHWyw7tVIvhg4b4q/rT2uWyKNfgQznBc3i/cR1m3XC X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5e93:: with SMTP id f19mr41013550otl.121.1578067110408; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 07:58:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578067110; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZgK731xIXU8MzDEHGEXqLXOLnMf3xY0D/W16YGZAxK1cArOu18/Z45XeHWp8GH2nn8 /+gCXvyeS56eZYqMAatmKqfPUGd591AjFJGsKYM8gf3F4N+DzhYTuxliQfArzuXGHEJh T8QYEmexAnboPJRJqdI0islp5kTaykBA2FqXAQIMt0Cm20xCsQizc6DZrFzlRRTmn9qz 0D9k/nhTqyKZe/teQ70x/2PGuxaNExz9lfKiAfzEY+776pdSt5C6Vwjxsn3qOSSaVJZo 9ppqzvY2kH6Om5gdxqHmJbKLdv1gTe+BjLY8rm9aewu00s3nYrcOXc5BI1QWPpe5Ti5x mUaQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version; bh=l+/GvgT4Jc3e0HH0BXXYhE01HnFkcfeZyEosd4mcvB0=; b=Z58UoHN8M5DEwVReXmaJjyAScoGNkQbVOip6qAH4ihJdTQiLmNIgGerJWNEMVUgr+u CImXw6oK2NpYm0JQVAnC+z7uuZ6OgrzrHqjLD9nUn6xpqHmoDmRq1EP1JguKXLGBnaq6 FrLmNvCmPpjaxsWabx9qEaa7XmRimugdZgKp3vC47mwdy7vUJlPQ/3a53bGvzO1Ha9yx v0Y+PnqqVgE/VdW11nL4NS0Lemg2p/3HfKRHhccTn9fPKwc7r72m713S4BptiSp4sqZn 6Be1KuZjlsDp5w6G+LrsuxSSApJprtiyLGOOX6KiZ/4KEe1VZE72uc9iW4ZX3Hdm0Dyh JNZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f17si27704774otl.181.2020.01.03.07.58.17; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 07:58:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727948AbgACP4v (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:56:51 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.74]:52479 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727539AbgACP4v (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:56:51 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f45.google.com ([209.85.219.45]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue106 [212.227.15.145]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MC3L9-1isbSW2jtt-00CVW5; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 16:56:49 +0100 Received: by mail-qv1-f45.google.com with SMTP id y8so16385056qvk.6; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 07:56:49 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXpWAAcWsL0c11bt7l/seQLaP6iUtt3BJBKllxxroWXw8vFI1FI MXwtILgMrPa9gpor774GFPVcADV2rIwAd6R5hCM= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e7c7:: with SMTP id c7mr68933990qvo.222.1578067008436; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 07:56:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200102215829.911231638@linuxfoundation.org> <20200103154518.GB1064304@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20200103154518.GB1064304@kroah.com> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 16:56:32 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/191] 5.4.8-stable review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Naresh Kamboju , open list , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, Ben Hutchings , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, linux- stable , Chengguang Xu , Mike Kravetz , David Howells , Al Viro , Sasha Levin , LTP List , Jan Stancek , John Stultz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:4fMLrImlcdsyOYIxBRFPO2dG0gOCSP3VpN+YNO478EJfix+DVzo jL7J692OmqUzwCCaueFEkzm6A0x+awbG6L3JulFk1emi2R5M/rKOMn40wsbZ8EgpXC2PQQ9 gT1rlP09DGAp2X4gtusFT/6ZBOudRKGGkpwaXVVLSYVOzNpGIp4GJi4DRgorWMdDWkW8NI9 ASnbqgLhV9hz5N12Y1Rhg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:62Aiqo52ap0=:tLFUxBUYtAlTl7pbpokuIX 2eMQ+rf4ItCgtV8LuCDSHX4zEgaRvWZl4SOn51tO7lyUPsk1/eX4t8xt4zmuSLAQ7CYG1x+T9 WP7W5mTkU5Bao8wn1f9/OfqKyjrlUNp8CFoXFnHTdvpSPyUkQSM8C5dW636GEuQcH9cUWcp0N feXWN4YjX4ocz5LKBY5S8daPsLjlWk/tto2id1a1tIoJNhsUTtrH57vI8D2x61cdiFEXszA1S GAmenkjP+H1IQdfGpYfZ2KIwVKQE+s3VI12AmjUIt2PhgFA1HOL5Bys6qFAmYj7Kzln1Ac6wz pIlNZWuIMKywCNtG++9RlWlXNASMaZUlLTdItXwJwcUq0Nf7ut6OlbICv8+oivXcFOijNF4sP FjMSts+ek1TXqJN6kdjV8W5Vr3Igc/6eNa5+CswTrAxsu4obWE0FgXiuU1LNnPwGvVTE7CabS j0cUko7yyq7QddXWcTaObwWKOlFcMd8nUt3KjoNIpfX0Vy9yinlWa0aolQtNERSnX4X3xHS2w YkeYgK0+TGLX13aa1Qu7WKzFooLm7DQIjsiPnMp8VE7hs7CbODkNVNoB4uwu84S0Og0yQ6XaD jwnCRhUJxT95xwirdkJmSfKhbwWfXFqvRKp8GBsfjOtmpmBMmSepqmiycw9NasvyAnTvXk4SF dW8z2HEoa2nkO9VkasgSmqFjYjK2VPeEWWc5CpC9CyB98X4jTF46tlV3Ej7G+oeKv3LTu8YHW XTr1Fwby7ugZ9Qk4I+pk6yfln1L9/IAB9MCGLomNGzdGsMyVN/u9WOUveac8GHTIcsX5sPxMp lkT77snXX59v3oHMBQGRYibXL/0zESofyk9WcqY0NdGtBplv9B4j2cmi73okB1gdFpawNbHdS 8T8DhNTl+8ui6qfIg8iA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 4:45 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 04:29:56PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 4:25 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 03:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > > wrote: > > > > > > -ENOENT is what you get when hugetlbfs is not mounted, so this hints to > > > > > > 8fc312b32b2 mm/hugetlbfs: fix error handling when setting up mounts > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/commit/?h=linux-5.4.y&id=3f549fb42a39bea3b29c0fc12afee53c4a01bec9 > > > > I see that Mike Kravetz suggested not putting this patch into stable in > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/befca227-cb8a-8f47-617d-e3bf9972bfec@oracle.com/ > > > > but it was picked through the autosel mechanism later. > > So does that mean that Linus's tree shows this LTP failure as well? Yes, according to https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-oe/tests/ltp-syscalls-tests/memfd_create04 mainline has the same testcase failure, it started happening between v5.4-10135-gc3bfc5dd73c6 and v5.4-10271-g596cf45cbf6e, when the patch was originally merged into 5.5-rc1. > This does seem to fix a real issue, as shown by the LTP test noticing > it, so should the error code value be fixed in Linus's tree? No idea what to conclude from the testcase failure, let's see if Mike has any suggestions. Arnd