Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 3 Jan 2020 16:52:56 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Gary R Hook <gary.hook@amd.com>
Cc:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
        Sanjay R Mehta <Sanju.Mehta@amd.com>,
        kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
        Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com, Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com,
        davem@davemloft.net, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
        Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: ptdma: Initial driver for the AMD
 PassThru DMA engine
Message-ID: <20200103155256.GC1064304@kroah.com>
References: <1577458047-109654-1-git-send-email-Sanju.Mehta@amd.com>
 <201912280738.zotyIgEi%lkp@intel.com>
 <20200103062630.GD2818@vkoul-mobl>
 <de0bf6de-5c44-bb81-f3ac-2db1c1c4595d@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <de0bf6de-5c44-bb81-f3ac-2db1c1c4595d@amd.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 09:12:18AM -0600, Gary R Hook wrote:
> On 1/3/20 12:26 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 28-12-19, 07:56, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > Hi Sanjay,
> > > 
> > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> > 
> > Please fix the issues reported and also make sure the patches sent are
> > threaded, right now they are not and the series is all over my inbox :(
> > 
> 
> What does this mean? The patches showed up in my inbox as a set of 3,
> properly indexed, just like they should when sent with "git send-email".
> 
> We've not had any reports from other lists/maintainers of similar problems.
> So you'll understand how we might be a bit confused.
> 
> Would you please elaborate on the problem you are seeing?

There was no email threading of the patches, they all looked like
individual emails.  In other words, the "In-Reply-To:" value was not
set.

thanks,

greg k-h