Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 4 Jan 2020 10:42:29 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Cc:     Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] Consolidate dummy_con initialization
Message-ID: <20200104094229.GA1279126@kroah.com>
References: <20191218204002.30512-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
 <20200103171223.GA1308999@rani.riverdale.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200103171223.GA1308999@rani.riverdale.lan>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 12:12:24PM -0500, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 03:39:38PM -0500, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > This series moves initialization of conswitchp to dummy_con into vt.c,
> > and configures DUMMY_CONSOLE unconditionally when CONFIG_VT is enabled.
> > 
> > The patches after the second one remove conswitchp = &dummy_con; from
> > the various architecture setup functions where it currently appears. If
> > the first two look ok, I was thinking of sending the others
> > individually.
> > 
> 
> Hi Greg/Jiri, happy new year!
> 
> Are you able to look at this series?
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191218214506.49252-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu/

It's in my review queue which is really long at the moment, sorry.
Please be patient.

greg k-h