Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp21082341ybl; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 19:42:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxi/WXtNAquysIgTl3NQ9sTQCWS0oCybqx04hLrLUWG//tNcPeTqNXEvln9raffELJkRjNb X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7ada:: with SMTP id m26mr17240971otn.111.1578282128094; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 19:42:08 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578282128; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xYe02xWTJ3n+9xrpUOnlP0JMCP5Ey/jnKu1ynj9MJrUA8hDq0OK0VwrVBOjG2ofH82 +G4yuyHdhmvKCaKKIj4Lh3VM/5pYPFdjhVO86sb0AycODf6lvt2+gPeDo1by6PlTgDx7 TlKOZ+zLqtRjpypPRtfM1GIxZJQS30aYchxQ7QctdfFTrh4hESz4ugf5cGo9UQlG+Oro HsLDn+RzUJNVWQuCoCfLXbyZJN6/r+O8Uz1w87CL6ExsgGao5Zwgen7lmmcUa2wTtgmi /CiXw/OVKy6WAieiOPn9EH3nPUhKnEzizBOeYblLhqh+B+dZ2ijXrDzJ99AgnLjGI781 /3tg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=tJ0y6yvP1Yptnf5g8h9MHDTsHLmAZnlSa0x8ChhobMA=; b=bGS2SdNx7oG/eJ/iXjST8nXsdB6MNOP2bLFABSmXDqubLROTel8KKc92msqKoeOgZO z744/pDXFEW8O73YVom2p7oYj1+XTvIIzo/QD1vMkrFVjPAapqEyTx6yLRcabP9Lfs9f Q9oynLlYVTy+hN8oxU0Kgi/O3RoJfn2lK6q2DpnuCkSJ+JBrjuwhOU80Qy9Af/W5DkgL k+vCMEOMI8+QR+QBiCivXZYLJFQl8BZ3PmEnpVPS2p2Y00jpZ6WH1Vtw/kza5cyjFytI Jg7r9fV+B2/90YHbyTZSSWAiDc6ZnvPMC7T86DSTheAUuNwXpw2d+x6zgDyM3nY0xKll ybzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d5si32087583oij.139.2020.01.05.19.41.56; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 19:42:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727473AbgAFDlL (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 5 Jan 2020 22:41:11 -0500 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:54644 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727307AbgAFDlK (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Jan 2020 22:41:10 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C6404996695D43207D1B; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 11:41:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 11:41:05 +0800 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] Multidevice f2fs mount after disk rearrangement To: Oleksandr Natalenko , CC: Jaegeuk Kim , References: <4c6cf8418236145f7124ac61eb2908ad@natalenko.name> <2c4cafd35d1595a62134203669d7c244@natalenko.name> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 11:41:04 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2c4cafd35d1595a62134203669d7c244@natalenko.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Thanks for the report. :) On 2020/1/5 5:52, Oleksandr Natalenko via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote: > Hi. > > On 04.01.2020 17:29, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: >> I was brave enough to create f2fs filesystem spanning through 2 >> physical device using this command: >> >> # mkfs.f2fs -t 0 /dev/sdc -c /dev/sdd >> >> It worked fine until I removed /dev/sdb from my system, so f2fs devices >> became: >> >> /dev/sdc -> /dev/sdb >> /dev/sdd -> /dev/sdc >> >> Now, when I try to mount it, I get the following: >> >> # mount -t f2fs /dev/sdb /mnt/fs >> mount: /mnt/fs: mount(2) system call failed: No such file or directory. >> >> In dmesg: >> >> [Jan 4 17:25] F2FS-fs (sdb): Mount Device [ 0]: /dev/sdc, >> 59063, 0 - 1cd6fff >> [ +0,000024] F2FS-fs (sdb): Failed to find devices >> >> fsck also fails with the following assertion: >> >> [ASSERT] (init_sb_info: 908) !strcmp((char *)sb->devs[i].path, (char >> *)c.devices[i].path) >> >> Am I doing something obviously stupid, and the device path can be >> (somehow) changed so that the mount succeeds, or this is unfixable, >> and f2fs relies on persistent device naming? >> >> Please suggest. >> >> Thank you. > > Erm, fine. I studied f2fs-tools code a little bit and discovered that > superblock indeed had /dev/sdX paths saved as strings. So I fired up > hexedit and just changed the superblock directly on the first device, > substituting sdc with sdb and sdd with sdc (I did it twice; I guess > there are 2 copies of superblock), and after this the mount worked. Alright, it works if superblock checksum feature is off... > > Am I really supposed to do this manually ;)? We'd better add that ability in tune.f2fs. And I guess we need to let kernel/fsck to notice that case, and give hint to run tune.f2fs to reconfigure primary/secondary/... device paths. Thanks, >