Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp21177555ybl; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 22:32:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxhkm/8HB7iRsl59AuTcakhIkNe+zo2R5dVTVH6y6fKvfgMixY4kMAggvj65U1Tp7r1eEdi X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7c91:: with SMTP id q17mr99969770otn.293.1578292352125; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 22:32:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578292352; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xi5OUfUUD1m6J7Ool25DcFuAYwIAnsuyR7gMkTGkVoCdmM9XSJQo4nkhWkeUE0ffMY 1cfmAhZdzUYK54ihEZk1jPDA2bLRHXI3LQWQpQKM5eHzkfEf+FvsTuMdfF71uWMHRcCv aEvPvKg7VShDAxyLHQWN64Fmv2ZwRah3JY4YzKTHqI78ThlumxWFKYxLlJrWA13ZZuIa TIrdk02hCLHhpXNG7LRU0S70AFRg7hxdt0oZ4kXMLitY08G9pAG63OUIndnYyl0uZy+m 0vA/f+tFw+R9UA4hvPVht0Q/GBCgRcDXDie/KWFCX7ovMvBi1c/0H13pmMcd0EYX2VGo ezsw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=JRGo8le+9i4ZhirzPOFIvhIDR4OF2dkxma1rGnQiIrg=; b=oG00gO8MG9aE3MZSgVHlgLT+FjQrMdAMYvcvUdeZUmvApQ+agJ42LGSTvDlbL4H7YV /PcfsWNYbwEabdWP20NC0HIj+1FpQ/3vYiD8mVceTSlPmTTwCPjN3wkD6NHgBr4tiOQF umTgCH27KCHPkZ8Oz13esqq4zbjIMzP2gAFNyM5imPHpN31gp4wBQrJPIADvKYQqjQEb cDO4zkrjOYOt7dlMH+Uh8EvsPdKugr7WyJeNn9YvXA0ZJ5QufFeS8MTChCG3ajJbVFaG liZPpqZbd8gZIMZbdBK+pdVCPdrnWwXoQXbEOp+7lpBuCwrVoHWRrG926Ugu/2z22H89 el0g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l8si31825530oii.249.2020.01.05.22.32.19; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 22:32:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727105AbgAFGbg (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 Jan 2020 01:31:36 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:14278 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726895AbgAFGbg (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2020 01:31:36 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0066RdNO115859 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 01:31:35 -0500 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xb97b7kdc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 01:31:35 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:31:33 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:31:30 -0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0066VTP650790644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:31:29 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33E011C2FC; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:05:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174F611C2F8; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:05:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.148.8.170]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:04:59 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 08:04:58 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Martin Schwidefsky , Collin Walling , Gerald Schaefer , Philipp Rudo , Andrew Morton , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock: Define memblock_physmem_add() References: <1578283835-21969-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1578283835-21969-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20010606-0012-0000-0000-0000037ACAA5 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20010606-0013-0000-0000-000021B6E2A9 Message-Id: <20200106060458.GB5413@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-06_01:2020-01-06,2020-01-06 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-2001060059 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:40:35AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On s390 platform memblock.physmem array is being built by directly calling > into memblock_add_range() which is a low level function not intended to be > used outside of memblock. Hence lets conditionally add helper functions for > physmem array when HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP is enabled. Also use MAX_NUMNODES > instead of 0 as node ID similar to memblock_add() and memblock_reserve(). > Make memblock_add_range() a static function as it is no longer getting used > outside of memblock. > > Cc: Heiko Carstens > Cc: Vasily Gorbik > Cc: Christian Borntraeger > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky > Cc: Collin Walling > Cc: Gerald Schaefer > Cc: Philipp Rudo > Cc: Mike Rapoport > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport > --- > Only build tested for s390, will appreciate if some one can give it a try > on a real system. > > Changes from RFC: > > - Dropped all memblock_dbg() changes per Mike > - Renamed memblock_physmem() as memblock_physmem_add() per Mike > - Made memblock_add_range() a static function per Mike > - Updated the commit message > > RFC: (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11316627/) > > arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 12 +++--------- > include/linux/memblock.h | 7 +++---- > mm/memblock.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c > index b9104ae162f4..424cb8fd2c35 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c > @@ -762,14 +762,6 @@ static void __init free_mem_detect_info(void) > memblock_free(start, size); > } > > -static void __init memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size) > -{ > - memblock_dbg("memblock_physmem_add: [%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", > - start, start + size - 1); > - memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, start, size, 0, 0); > - memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, start, size, 0, 0); > -} > - > static const char * __init get_mem_info_source(void) > { > switch (mem_detect.info_source) { > @@ -794,8 +786,10 @@ static void __init memblock_add_mem_detect_info(void) > get_mem_info_source(), mem_detect.info_source); > /* keep memblock lists close to the kernel */ > memblock_set_bottom_up(true); > - for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end) > + for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end) { > + memblock_add(start, end - start); > memblock_physmem_add(start, end - start); > + } > memblock_set_bottom_up(false); > memblock_dump_all(); > } > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h > index b38bbefabfab..079d17d96410 100644 > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h > @@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ int memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > int memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > int memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP > +int memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > +#endif > void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align); > bool memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type, > phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > @@ -127,10 +130,6 @@ void reset_node_managed_pages(pg_data_t *pgdat); > void reset_all_zones_managed_pages(void); > > /* Low level functions */ > -int memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type, > - phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, > - int nid, enum memblock_flags flags); > - > void __next_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid, enum memblock_flags flags, > struct memblock_type *type_a, > struct memblock_type *type_b, phys_addr_t *out_start, > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > index 4bc2c7d8bf42..fc0d4db1d646 100644 > --- a/mm/memblock.c > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_insert_region(struct memblock_type *type, > * Return: > * 0 on success, -errno on failure. > */ > -int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type, > +static int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type, > phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, > int nid, enum memblock_flags flags) > { > @@ -830,6 +830,18 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) > return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP > +int __init_memblock memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) > +{ > + phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1; > + > + memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__, > + &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_); > + > + return memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0); > +} > +#endif > + > /** > * memblock_setclr_flag - set or clear flag for a memory region > * @base: base address of the region > -- > 2.20.1 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.