Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp21848701ybl; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 12:32:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwkhkj0qqV742nN4xSeTYvuPIP/w2ohe1r4QW4ufmdwZ66y3B3Q9ygz5ChBO9TGS4XS/+vU X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6c01:: with SMTP id f1mr111893549otq.133.1578342739015; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 12:32:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578342739; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bic/A1EX2OLrUprBrk0kR9MMI+8puR4lsE5K6d8+n+dr1C0kg+1NNcTr03209C9jxq 1j/i1ZkRKH10Bw8pRbWn430yqP3HmC3uw8+eA492LNLnQH0xqgO/9iv53V1XWnH7C/IT 9iiYwPPtc7rJTfWWH8xjEhgtUVi0afRPWrt2DPd2oSRvjPKMhrCxmmuguu706Z++p0ze +gIQ6agy21Ag6QnkPgSazWNgLT0scVR95KUpr518/xNY9ZQWj2QyHJ8HpEWD//iXrLYZ NL2qw0AObdfiOKMK8p2Ci4wr9IdZ4icLG8HZYuv5JiX9/dITOC+ZMJ2bypj0lnGKyc1d eM7Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=JTyGmt8uVcR/uTzxh7JmLiBd+Kl/jnqlCoqzmv5rr24=; b=OyZcI3eGThXNkbH8kaOROm2bIjU3itkQRFmqvjSOZrxxTmBQwUHFXOkGH0CJGKdLk9 UD+aLK12LWnihir8eI+k3x95+85mP5mu7dG2SfPMPnSkVW0J/YeIffP3YaSE/XNrhVbj 2GvyDdNvaQcrtyVXyv/DtFcu2MUiOsvQlzVuH+3iDHUzZvxd7LjCBrPJpLxiZV6KzAoL NBGMAczo0zIVchjUqpQcKoin+Ct//Mhp55OtkMc68+/a8US4W8OhR8o5zyTzdXi9Rc/w JkfUK+f1V9RJkjDTNg88E2wnFWrTac3KxBhqX9Avtf+VqoWCAsoqqJMREjfmJOEWsmSl OUDQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g6si17182250otk.171.2020.01.06.12.32.06; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 12:32:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726788AbgAFUbA (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 Jan 2020 15:31:00 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:10719 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727140AbgAFUa0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2020 15:30:26 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jan 2020 12:30:26 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,403,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="245699490" Received: from labuser-ice-lake-client-platform.jf.intel.com ([10.54.55.50]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2020 12:30:26 -0800 From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com To: peterz@infradead.org, acme@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, jolsa@kernel.org, eranian@google.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, Kan Liang Subject: [PATCH V5 RESEND 09/14] perf/x86/intel: Disable sampling read slots and topdown Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 12:29:14 -0800 Message-Id: <20200106202919.2943-10-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200106202919.2943-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> References: <20200106202919.2943-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Kan Liang The slots event supports sampling. Users may sampling read slots and metrics events, e.g perf record -e '{slots, topdown-retiring}:S'. But the metrics event will reset the fixed counter 3 which will impact the sampling of the slots event. Add specific validate_group() support to reject the case and error out for Icelake. An alternative fix may unconditionally disable SLOTS sampling. But it's not a decent fix. Because users may want to only sampling slot events without topdown metrics event. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang --- No changes since V4 arch/x86/events/core.c | 4 ++++ arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c index 333541c05815..48dd920c5e7d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c @@ -2111,7 +2111,11 @@ static int validate_group(struct perf_event *event) fake_cpuc->n_events = 0; ret = x86_pmu.schedule_events(fake_cpuc, n, NULL); + if (ret) + goto out; + if (x86_pmu.validate_group) + ret = x86_pmu.validate_group(fake_cpuc, n); out: free_fake_cpuc(fake_cpuc); return ret; diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c index d913dda3e1c2..7fbf268f5143 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c @@ -4512,6 +4512,25 @@ static __init void intel_ht_bug(void) x86_pmu.stop_scheduling = intel_stop_scheduling; } +static int icl_validate_group(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n) +{ + bool has_sampling_slots = false, has_metrics = false; + struct perf_event *e; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { + e = cpuc->event_list[i]; + if (is_slots_event(e) && is_sampling_event(e)) + has_sampling_slots = true; + + if (is_metric_event(e)) + has_metrics = true; + } + if (unlikely(has_sampling_slots && has_metrics)) + return -EINVAL; + return 0; +} + EVENT_ATTR_STR(mem-loads, mem_ld_hsw, "event=0xcd,umask=0x1,ldlat=3"); EVENT_ATTR_STR(mem-stores, mem_st_hsw, "event=0xd0,umask=0x82") @@ -5364,6 +5383,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void) intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_skl(pmem); x86_pmu.update_topdown_event = icl_update_topdown_event; x86_pmu.set_topdown_event_period = icl_set_topdown_event_period; + x86_pmu.validate_group = icl_validate_group; pr_cont("Icelake events, "); name = "icelake"; break; diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h index 404bf3f2c293..132ac123e83f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h @@ -661,6 +661,8 @@ struct x86_pmu { int perfctr_second_write; u64 (*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, u64 l); + int (*validate_group)(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n); + /* PMI handler bits */ unsigned int late_ack :1, counter_freezing :1; -- 2.17.1