Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
In-Reply-To: <20191217073730.21249-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To:     Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>, <agust@denx.de>
From:   Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
Cc:     vkoul@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/512x: Use dma_request_chan() instead dma_request_slave_channel()
Message-Id: <47sBdq0f5Dz9sRh@ozlabs.org>
Date:   Tue,  7 Jan 2020 10:33:18 +1100 (AEDT)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2019-12-17 at 07:37:30 UTC, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> dma_request_slave_channel() is a wrapper on top of dma_request_chan()
> eating up the error code.
> 
> By using dma_request_chan() directly the driver can support deferred
> probing against DMA.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>

Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/fb185a4052b18c97ebc98f6a8db30a60abca35e0

cheers