Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] mmc: sdhci: Factor out some operations set to
 their own functions
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
CC:     <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <kishon@ti.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, <tony@atomide.com>
References: <20200106110133.13791-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com>
 <20200106110133.13791-3-faiz_abbas@ti.com>
 <CADBw62qR5F8h4YbpWfU2UESeoR3zXzS=eePMvQHuT7NQE5hdSA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
Message-ID: <27fded85-d195-0a82-899a-bb6e727258dc@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Jan 2020 12:52:13 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADBw62qR5F8h4YbpWfU2UESeoR3zXzS=eePMvQHuT7NQE5hdSA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Baolin,

On 07/01/20 12:04 pm, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi Faiz,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 7:01 PM Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com> wrote:
>>
>> In preparation for adding external dma support, factor out data initialization,
>> block info and mrq_done to their own functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> index 1b1c26da3fe0..f6999054abcf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> @@ -1025,18 +1025,9 @@ static void sdhci_set_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
>>         }
>>  }
>>
>> -static void sdhci_prepare_data(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
>> +static void sdhci_initialize_data(struct sdhci_host *host,
>> +                                 struct mmc_data *data)
>>  {
>> -       struct mmc_data *data = cmd->data;
>> -
>> -       host->data_timeout = 0;
>> -
>> -       if (sdhci_data_line_cmd(cmd))
>> -               sdhci_set_timeout(host, cmd);
>> -
>> -       if (!data)
>> -               return;
>> -
>>         WARN_ON(host->data);
>>
>>         /* Sanity checks */
>> @@ -1048,6 +1039,36 @@ static void sdhci_prepare_data(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
>>         host->data_early = 0;
>>         host->data->bytes_xfered = 0;
>>
> 
> Can you remove above redundant blank line?
Ok.
> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void sdhci_set_block_info(struct sdhci_host *host,
>> +                                       struct mmc_data *data)
>> +{
>> +
> 
> Ditto.
Ok.
> 
> Otherwise, please add my tested tag if feel free.
> 
> Tested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>

Which platform did you test this on?

Thanks,
Faiz