Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:22:30 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
Cc:     Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix printing ptrs in preempt/irq
 enable/disable events
Message-ID: <20200107092230.473d7fc1@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <dc9a1a6a32b0e028837a315834c4723ed44dbac5.camel@st.com>
References: <20191127154428.191095-1-antonio.borneo@st.com>
        <20191204092115.30ef75c9@gandalf.local.home>
        <20191221234741.GA116648@google.com>
        <20191223151301.20be63f7@gandalf.local.home>
        <dc9a1a6a32b0e028837a315834c4723ed44dbac5.camel@st.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:21:55 +0100
Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com> wrote:

> There are other cases where the trace buffer is under stress, e.g. during function tracing.
> Would it be useful to only store the offset in such cases too?

It could be possible but may require another event type and an option,
as it may break existing tooling.

-- Steve