Message-ID: <43D9D681.7020002@namesys.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:14:57 -0800
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
CC: Edward Shishkin <edward@namesys.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Reiserfs mail-list <Reiserfs-List@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4,
 unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress)
References: <43D7C6BE.1010804@namesys.com> <43D7CA7F.4010502@namesys.com> <20060126153343.GH4311@suse.de> <43D91225.3030605@namesys.com> <20060126185612.GM4311@suse.de> <43D933EB.6080009@namesys.com> <20060127080625.GS4311@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20060127080625.GS4311@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 824
Lines: 23

Jens Axboe wrote:

> So the systime quoted above is basically useless, it doesn't reflect the
>
>real time spent in the kernel by far. I think you should note that when
>you post these scores, otherwise you're really showing a skewed picture.
>
>  
>
He wasn't expecting me to post the benchmark, and I frankly only looked
at the real time and forgot there was a systime in there that needed
cutting out when I posted it. My error, not his. I must say though, the
real time makes me quite happy, especially considering how CPUs are just
going to keep getting faster.

Best,

Hans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/