Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:29:44 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com>, yong.liang@mediatek.com,
        wim@linux-watchdog.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
        matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        chang-an.chen@mediatek.com, freddy.hsin@mediatek.com,
        yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, sboyd@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] dt-bindings: mediatek: mt8183: Add #reset-cells
Message-ID: <20200107182944.GB22909@roeck-us.net>
References: <1578280296-18946-1-git-send-email-jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com>
 <1578280296-18946-2-git-send-email-jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com>
 <20200106215721.GB31059@bogus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200106215721.GB31059@bogus>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:57:21PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 11:11:35 +0800, Jiaxin Yu wrote:
> > Add #reset-cells property and update example
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: yong.liang <yong.liang@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mtk-wdt.txt  | 10 ++++++---
> >  .../reset-controller/mt2712-resets.h          | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../reset-controller/mt8183-resets.h          | 17 ++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mt2712-resets.h
> > 
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

v9 and a couple of versions before that did not include the update to
the bindings file. I got lost in the many versions and don't recall if
that was ever tagged as Reviewed-by: in an earlier version.

Guenter