Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <d32d1c1e6f32eeed811fa00e1b5d8ca121eea70f.camel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] ata: ahci_brcm: Follow-up changes for BCM7216
From:   Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jaedon Shin <jaedon.shin@gmail.com>,
        "open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers)" 
        <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 08 Jan 2020 10:25:03 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20200107183022.26224-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
References: <20200107183022.26224-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Florian,

On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 10:30 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Jens, Philipp,
> 
> These three patches are a follow-up to my previous series titled: ata:
> ahci_brcm: Fixes and new device support.
> 
> After submitting the BCM7216 RESCAL reset driver, Philipp the reset
> controller maintained indicated that the reset line should be self
> de-asserting and so reset_control_reset() should be used instead.
> 
> These three patches update the driver in that regard. It would be great if
> you could apply those and get them queued up for 5.6 since they are
> directly related to the previous series.
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - introduced a preliminary patch making use of the proper reset control
>   API in order to manage the optional reset controller line
> - updated patches after introducing that preliminary patch

The third patch could be simplified by storing the rescal reset control
in a separate struct member and relying on the optional reset control
API more. This is just a suggestion though, the series looks fine as-is.

Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>

regards
Philipp