From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060127092817.GB24362@infradead.org> 
References: <20060127092817.GB24362@infradead.org>  <1138312694656@2gen.com> <1138312695665@2gen.com> 
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: David H?rdeman <david@2gen.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@linux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/04] Add multi-precision-integer maths library 
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:07:50 +0000
Message-ID: <6403.1138392470@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1188
Lines: 26

Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> This is ugly as hell.  If we decided to add it it really needs a major
> cleanup, fitting into linux style and removal of unused functionality,
> the assembly bits needs to move to an asm/ header, etc.

Which would make it harder to compare against the original, and so potentially
harder to track bug fixes in the original was my thinking.

> But to be honest I'd say anything that requires bigints shouldn't go into
> the kernel at all.  Could someone explain why they want dsa support in
> kernelspace?

Well... I'd like to revisit module signing at some point, though I imagine
it'll cause the LKML to melt again by those who think that I shouldn't have
the right to sign my modules because they imagine it impinges on their
rights:-) But I suspect the reason David wants this is so that he can encrypt
something with keys that he's not actually permitted to retrieve
directly. David?

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/