Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1488659ybl; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:45:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwBn9Dq227yXA4/qlFkTpJXdiWKKOxXORxdBONl4fEp7aEHkShynJJ8niUEeD6ZxAmykTt+ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1651:: with SMTP id h17mr6336160otr.167.1578537904329; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 18:45:04 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578537904; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rjPnFn0Aa1I7LY/nDXKHhr+Bgh1ps0WAoJA6K5VYlNcTOaFVLECxKvGLqDlAzNKkCh R0eLKVl6QaMTbEoMpcHbpmFH8P+XAQGYQB8CImRxnRcfagRZqJQqlctdYIcE82CvQB/a gjzFBEBN2tlShn49vR6jO8qtMWptKRTqt5MGtKUTW9PB4lVnTuAaYEGPypcpl8Sd+foK VvDF5ItQz1EBiMGzrz8LS8RcCWd22jXbtgi4R9eH+JYLlCzv/pk6Mdoj/M67W+5pd2S9 ESQ1DuhzBYE7nPrVbh39B1uQmF4mMcr/wfVb7WdmEcLOIQNW+6LYeKO/Mbw72Elt5HQu mEXA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=F5TjjjS3v9FQPMljQzjSkJQFnDWafj44gaYLenssX4c=; b=a1BszCf5z19TU+4xZ9nxau5a8Aezd3HqgbNui5szpOeU4+1R4CPBWduwVt2kT17MHk vF5PNlPJLnjZrO0hHNc/MtUjKXm9VZlFajR4DI+W3et0F+8CRZXLf/7gftgxbODTHWfY hPBWYUMf2QSM6FRpnadNGh1f46LvNJFHCzo9UfkiM2tEn4DrBfgOw7tDXLxkjoEGhK5v bxXMHJOzODhUoAnaQ559xeYTTgRCanLatpET+XafqgGP6v7upSco6dsdOAzEw7e2VErl hMrhN8qRSMDkB5JVw/r0oxmq/VoyPS345qfQcOOA4uyI+YkD500Xggj0OJlk6rGQ+QDp CHzg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=lEyXzYQg; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q9si2745443oij.125.2020.01.08.18.44.52; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 18:45:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=lEyXzYQg; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728039AbgAICoD (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 8 Jan 2020 21:44:03 -0500 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:55012 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727884AbgAICoD (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jan 2020 21:44:03 -0500 Received: from nramas-ThinkStation-P520.corp.microsoft.com (unknown [131.107.174.108]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B87320B4798; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:44:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 9B87320B4798 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1578537842; bh=F5TjjjS3v9FQPMljQzjSkJQFnDWafj44gaYLenssX4c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=lEyXzYQgIM4WkmIrR10Cl8bwZMQv3DzA0SCja4QTjQtV+w8MVWb82bpqiQQjOgC+t bbjZRCorwFScCouBAw85qsTZTBfhXOvRRJFtP7fRcH7TxcVFqsYa3NEzk9YCWN4QoX mORy8q/PsfCwI75g2pdasYjkh92nCkhHRC++Zwwg= From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian To: zohar@linux.ibm.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, matthewgarrett@google.com, sashal@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v8 0/3] IMA: Deferred measurement of keys Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:43:56 -0800 Message-Id: <20200109024359.3410-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The IMA subsystem supports measuring asymmetric keys when the key is created or updated[1]. But keys created or updated before a custom IMA policy is loaded are currently not measured. This includes keys added, for instance, to either the .ima or .builtin_trusted_keys keyrings, which happens early in the boot process. Measuring the early boot keys, by design, requires loading a custom IMA policy. This change adds support for queuing keys created or updated before a custom IMA policy is loaded. The queued keys are processed when a custom policy is loaded. Keys created or updated after a custom policy is loaded are measured immediately (not queued). In the case when a custom policy is not loaded within 5 minutes of IMA initialization, the queued keys are freed. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20191211164707.4698-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/ Testing performed: * Ran kernel self-test following the instructions given in https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kselftest.txt * Ran the lkp-tests using the job script provided by kernel test robot * Booted the kernel with this change. * Added .builtin_trusted_keys in "keyrings=" option in the IMA policy and verified the keys added to this keyring are measured. * Specified only func=KEY_CHECK and not "keyrings=" option, and verified the keys added to builtin_trusted_keys keyring are processed. * Added keys at runtime and verified they are measured if the IMA policy permitted. => For example, added keys to .ima keyring and verified. Changelog: v8 => Rebased the changes to linux-next => Need to apply the following patch first https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20200108160508.5938-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/ v7 => Updated cover letter per Mimi's suggestions. => Updated "Reported-by" tag to be specific about the issues fixed in the patch. v6 => Replaced mutex with a spinlock to sychronize access to queued keys. This fixes the problem reported by "kernel test robot " https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/2a831fe9-30e5-63b4-af10-a69f327f7fb7@linux.microsoft.com/T/#t => Changed ima_queue_key() to a static function. This fixes the issue reported by "kbuild test robot " https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/1577370464.4487.10.camel@linux.ibm.com/ => Added the patch to free the queued keys if a custom IMA policy was not loaded to this patch set. v5 => Removed temp keys list in ima_process_queued_keys() v4 => Check and set ima_process_keys flag with mutex held. v3 => Defined ima_process_keys flag to be static. => Set ima_process_keys with ima_keys_mutex held. => Added a comment in ima_process_queued_keys() function to state the use of temporary list for keys. v2 => Rebased the changes to v5.5-rc1 => Updated function names, variable names, and code comments to be less verbose. v1 => Code cleanup v0 => Based changes on v5.4-rc8 => The following patchsets should be applied in that order https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/1572492694-6520-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20191204224131.3384-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/ => Added functions to queue and dequeue keys, and process the queued keys when custom IMA policies are applied. Lakshmi Ramasubramanian (3): IMA: Define workqueue for early boot key measurements IMA: Call workqueue functions to measure queued keys IMA: Defined timer to free queued keys security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 17 ++ security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c | 159 +++++++++++++++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c | 8 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 3 + 4 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.17.1